Vaccine

Well I for one will now, going forward, refer to all college sports as the "varsity team" purely to irk @soccersc

Apparently March Madness is going to have all varsity teams this year. Should be really competitive.

So just to have a little more fun and poke the bear a bit.

The official UCLA Student Athlete handbook (since UCLA was brought up) mentions Varsity 15 times.


Then you have the UCLA Athletic alumni association who refers to themselves as the "Bruins Varsity Club". But maybe they didn't go to UCLA otherwise they would know this, especially if they played "Varsity" sports. ;)

 
The thread titled "Vaccine" is now the repository for anyone's daily rants. I think it's time to retire the thread, or at least admit it no longer has much relevant content. Maybe a new OT/COVID forum thread titled "Mandates" could soak up some of the crap.
It’s always been that way. Even the plumbers attempt at a non-political music video thread devolved into nono nonsense.
 
Thanks for ruining people's lives Elitist. I see some of you guys working the angle and think you can just come back as if nothing happen. "Time to move on from the vaccine rants and nothing to see here. Move right a long folks." Let me tell you, Karma is coming and some will get Millstones tied around their necks. You dont steal two years of kids lives, kill kids, kill their parents and then ruin small business owners and steal their ability to earn a buck and tell them to go get a job. No vax, you're fired!!! A day of reckoning will hit some of you in the face. I am appalled at how we can joke now about the vaccine, "hahahha, Gaylord is in,,,,,hahahahahaha, hahahahahahahah. Sicko!! Loser!!! Cheater!!! Liar!! Elitist who stole soccer from little girls so they can make the money off the girls hard work. Liar to little girls. Loser Espola!!! I will NOT let any one of you off the hook until you stop or confess.
 
Last edited:
Look, it's an Elitist.......lol!

1643721849644.png

Many of you guys are actors and some will even cheat to win and will lie when caught!! Some will see it all and say nothing and turn the cheek away, as if not to see anything. Karma is coming if you sit their and do nothing and make jokes all day about death, people getting fired. 51% more suicide for girls. 300% more miscarriages. Abortions, plus even more abortions. Kiddos getting heart attacks and heart inflammation and record breaking numbers of adverse reactions that the news won;t report on the local news. Kids forced to wear mask to school, while the Elitist watch the Rams with no mask and all we do is joke and giggle like Justin and make stupid jokes when people are dying and protesting all around the world. This forum is full of bubble boys....lol! Your Elitist bubble is going to pop like never before. I think we have lot's of Justins at the forum. You guys stole little girls youth soccer. Think about that and let that sink into your elitist brains. Looks like it will take the Mother Truckers & Mother Earth to save us. The Truckers are tired and feel like the Elitist don;t give a shot about them.
 
Last edited:
This article is worth a read.

Talks about the 180 degree turnabout many had regarding a variety of issues regarding covid.

"By January 2022, however, the failure of the previous two years of U.S. COVID policies has become undeniable. Vaccinated people were once promised that they would be “dead ends” for the virus, but 80% of the first omicron cases in the United States were double vaccinated and one-third had received a booster. Many cities that implemented mask mandates and vaccine passports are seeing some of their highest case counts of the pandemic. As a result, the original justifications for COVID restrictions are now being openly contradicted by the same people who once argued for them—but without acknowledging the pivot. With the 2022 midterms in sight, the narrative is simply shifting without apology, and many of the arguments once made by “covidiots” are now being backed by Anthony Fauci, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, and the familiar cast of journalists and experts."

 
Talking about Rogan and the left which increasingly likes to censor people...a good read.

For years, their preferred censorship tactic was to expand and distort the concept of "hate speech” to mean "views that make us uncomfortable,” and then demand that such “hateful” views be prohibited on that basis. For that reason, it is now common to hear Democrats assert, falsely, that the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech does not protect “hate speech." Their political culture has long inculcated them to believe that they can comfortably silence whatever views they arbitrarily place into this category without being guilty of censorship.

-

The data proving a deeply radical authoritarian strain in Trump-era Democratic Party politics is ample and have been extensively reported here. Democrats overwhelmingly trust and love the FBI and CIA. Polls show they overwhelmingly favor censorship of the internet not only by Big Tech oligarchs but also by the state. Leading Democratic Party politicians have repeatedly subpoenaed social media executives and explicitly threatened them with legal and regulatory reprisals if they do not censor more aggressively — a likely violation of the First Amendment given decades of case law ruling that state officials are barred from coercing private actors to censor for them, in ways the Constitution prohibits them from doing directly.
--

And when it comes to authoritarian tactics, censorship has become the liberals’ North Star. Every week brings news of a newly banished heretic. Liberals cheered the news last week that Google's YouTube permanently banned the extremely popular video channel of conservative commentator Dan Bongino. His permanent ban was imposed for the crime of announcing that, moving forward, he would post all of his videos exclusively on the free speech video platform Rumble after he received a seven-day suspension from Google's overlords for spreading supposed COVID “disinformation.” What was Bongino's prohibited view that prompted that suspension? He claimed cloth masks do not work to stop the spread of COVID, a view shared by numerous experts and, at least in part, by the CDC.

--


It is not hyperbole to observe that there is now a concerted war on any platforms devoted to free discourse and which refuse to capitulate to the demands of Democratic politicians and liberal activists to censor. The spear of the attack are corporate media outlets, who demonize and try to render radioactive any platforms that allow free speech to flourish.



 
This article is worth a read.

Talks about the 180 degree turnabout many had regarding a variety of issues regarding covid.

"By January 2022, however, the failure of the previous two years of U.S. COVID policies has become undeniable. Vaccinated people were once promised that they would be “dead ends” for the virus, but 80% of the first omicron cases in the United States were double vaccinated and one-third had received a booster. Many cities that implemented mask mandates and vaccine passports are seeing some of their highest case counts of the pandemic. As a result, the original justifications for COVID restrictions are now being openly contradicted by the same people who once argued for them—but without acknowledging the pivot. With the 2022 midterms in sight, the narrative is simply shifting without apology, and many of the arguments once made by “covidiots” are now being backed by Anthony Fauci, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, and the familiar cast of journalists and experts."

This is just the beginning. People are just starting to examine the data as it becomes available - especially as it relates to children. Also, as things return toward a more normal life, people who have been irrationally fearful will reflect with a clearer perspective. Credibility's loss is division's gain.

The media also played a pivotal role in exaggerating COVID dangers for children, obfuscating age-related risk stratification, and portraying kids as superspreaders. Now that school closures are proving to be increasingly unpopular among voters in blue areas, outlets like The New York Times have started reporting on the harms caused by them. But it was many of the same media outlets that spent two years advocating for the necessity of closures, giving ammunition to teachers and administrators intent on keeping kids at home. The Los Angeles Times ran a story in January 2021 about children “apologizing” to their elderly relatives for spreading COVID, and The New York Times published an article claiming COVID would “soar” if schools were allowed to reopen.

Other reports from the paper of record claimed that babies were “especially vulnerable” (March 2020), that it was risky for children to play together (June 2020), that children under 5 may host up to “100 times as much of the virus in the upper respiratory tract as adults” (July 2020), that virtual learning provided Black families a relief from racism (October 2020), and quoted teachers who said that teaching in-person was like being offered as “tribute” in The Hunger Games (November 2020). Over and over again, the Times published terrifying stories about “disturbing,” “mysterious” symptoms of an extremely rare inflammatory condition in children, stoking anxiety about new and unknown threats to kids without providing context.
 
This is just the beginning. People are just starting to examine the data as it becomes available - especially as it relates to children. Also, as things return toward a more normal life, people who have been irrationally fearful will reflect with a clearer perspective. Credibility's loss is division's gain.

The media also played a pivotal role in exaggerating COVID dangers for children, obfuscating age-related risk stratification, and portraying kids as superspreaders. Now that school closures are proving to be increasingly unpopular among voters in blue areas, outlets like The New York Times have started reporting on the harms caused by them. But it was many of the same media outlets that spent two years advocating for the necessity of closures, giving ammunition to teachers and administrators intent on keeping kids at home. The Los Angeles Times ran a story in January 2021 about children “apologizing” to their elderly relatives for spreading COVID, and The New York Times published an article claiming COVID would “soar” if schools were allowed to reopen.

Other reports from the paper of record claimed that babies were “especially vulnerable” (March 2020), that it was risky for children to play together (June 2020), that children under 5 may host up to “100 times as much of the virus in the upper respiratory tract as adults” (July 2020), that virtual learning provided Black families a relief from racism (October 2020), and quoted teachers who said that teaching in-person was like being offered as “tribute” in The Hunger Games (November 2020). Over and over again, the Times published terrifying stories about “disturbing,” “mysterious” symptoms of an extremely rare inflammatory condition in children, stoking anxiety about new and unknown threats to kids without providing context.
It's going to get ugly bro before it's better. Pray if you can or think positives for the Universe to "make love out of nothing at all." We need a love miracle asap. Love you bro :)

 
It's going to get ugly bro before it's better. Pray if you can or think positives for the Universe to "make love out of nothing at all." We need a love miracle asap. Love you bro :)

Air Supply? "make love out of nothing at all."

Ha! It's already ugly, Crush! I agree that it will get uglier before it gets better. If the upcoming midterms go in the direction they appear to be going now, it will cause a new wave of mental health issues greater than the one when Trump was elected. I did a quick search and while the link below is dated, I will be taking a look at investing in this space. I'm probably late but see great potential for future growth. ;)

 
This is available --


1,422,844 views

Bluetooth headphones on...
Kinda like the Espolas neighborhood should be retarded...oops.



“Amazon, Apple Music, and Qobuz deliver up to 100% of the music today and it sounds a lot better than the shitty, degraded and neutered sound of Spotify,” he wrote. “If you support Spotify, you are destroying an art form. Business over art. Spotify plays the artists’s music at 5% of its quality and charges you like it was the real thing.” Neil Young.

..your boy Neil is a hypocrite.
 
This is just the beginning. People are just starting to examine the data as it becomes available - especially as it relates to children. Also, as things return toward a more normal life, people who have been irrationally fearful will reflect with a clearer perspective. Credibility's loss is division's gain.

The media also played a pivotal role in exaggerating COVID dangers for children, obfuscating age-related risk stratification, and portraying kids as superspreaders. Now that school closures are proving to be increasingly unpopular among voters in blue areas, outlets like The New York Times have started reporting on the harms caused by them. But it was many of the same media outlets that spent two years advocating for the necessity of closures, giving ammunition to teachers and administrators intent on keeping kids at home. The Los Angeles Times ran a story in January 2021 about children “apologizing” to their elderly relatives for spreading COVID, and The New York Times published an article claiming COVID would “soar” if schools were allowed to reopen.

Other reports from the paper of record claimed that babies were “especially vulnerable” (March 2020), that it was risky for children to play together (June 2020), that children under 5 may host up to “100 times as much of the virus in the upper respiratory tract as adults” (July 2020), that virtual learning provided Black families a relief from racism (October 2020), and quoted teachers who said that teaching in-person was like being offered as “tribute” in The Hunger Games (November 2020). Over and over again, the Times published terrifying stories about “disturbing,” “mysterious” symptoms of an extremely rare inflammatory condition in children, stoking anxiety about new and unknown threats to kids without providing context.
Especially disturbing in light of what's happening with Pfizer and the under Looks like the powers that be will rush through the under 5 EU application even thought the results from a 2 dose vaccine were less than spectacular in terms of antibody response, there's no extensive study on efficacy, and a 3 dose is still under investigation. What's more disturbing is that if the FDA gives the go ahead, several jurisdictions might very well try to mandate it then for day care even though the studying on this has been rushed and inconclusive.

 
Back
Top