The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread
- Thread starter Nonononono
- Start date
Sheriff Joe
DA
Fake News.You people are absolutely disgusting.
34 people connected to White House, more than previously known, infected by coronavirus: Internal FEMA memo
The administration has sought to downplay the spread.www.google.com
He’s marching around the White House while contagious.
He’s a total loon.
This ain’t gonna end welll...at all.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Do you?
How about the Kenyan, CIA, FBI and sleepy joe railroading POTUS? We know that happened and you have no idea about trumps finances.
Keep spreading unsubstantiated bullshit.
How about the Kenyan, CIA, FBI and sleepy joe railroading POTUS? We know that happened and you have no idea about trumps finances.
Keep spreading unsubstantiated bullshit.
I’m sorry that fox and Trump have taught you not to believe the daily newspapers which have brought us our info for centuries.
Desert Hound
DA
Your daily info spread false info about russian collusion for years.
Now those very same news sources ignore the gov documents being produced under FOIA, etc that show just how wrong they were.
You get spoon fed the daily outrage of the day by completely partisan news outlets.
Very stable genius. More fake news. He’s a winner!
Remember that fake news quote when he said, referring to the pandemic, “it’s totally under control.”
All this fake news, jeez it’s so unfair.
Remember that fake news quote when he said, referring to the pandemic, “it’s totally under control.”
All this fake news, jeez it’s so unfair.
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
We have a history, centuries old, of daily newspapers throughout America and the world, as well as news agencies such as AP and Reuters and networks such as the BBC. You don’t believe them? That’s silly. And dumb.
You can choose to refuse to believe the facts that they issue forth, in which case you stay ignorant.
You display your ignorance daily on these pages and the basis is obvious. You don’t accept facts.
Desert Hound
DA
Actually I will type slowly for you since you fail to understand.
The press you talk about routinely ignores news items. Take the Russian hoax. AP, Reuters, etc all published countless stories of the walls closing in, the latest story about what appears to be more Trump Russia collusion, etc, etc. They did it for years.
Now the government is releasing documents that show a vastly different story about what actually happened. Almost all of it showing how wrong these news organizations were. Documents showing how badly people in the government failed/misbehaved. And I notice time and time again when you go to the various sites...AP, NY Times, etc. they don't even mention them. People who only use those as their news sources are completely in the dark related to the latest news.
Take the senate report released last week (or the week before) that has financial records of the wife of the mayor of Moscow wiring 3.5 million to Hunter Biden as just one example. You certainly wouldn't know much about if you read the NY Times.
They produced one story about the report.
With exactly one sentence: "The report released on Wednesday by the Senate Homeland Security Committee asserted that Hunter Biden traded on his father’s name to close lucrative business deals around the world."
That is the extent of their analysis of what the report detailed regarding Hunter's biz dealings.
As such their subscribers are missing rather important information regarding the family and how they receive a lot of money from other countries.
So they (you) are left in the dark. If as the press was warning during the Russian collusion hoax it is bad to receive help/money from them (the Russians)...then certainly it should be newsworthy that the nominee for Pres on the Dem side has a son who received millions of dollars from Russians.
If Russian influence is bad...then the press should report that the sub source that Steele used for his dossier was a person who US intelligence had been investigating because they were concerned he was a Russian spy. If you read the NY Times, AP, etc you will not find that information. That information has come out in gov documents over the past month or two.
Further the FBI knew this guy was the source of much of the Steele dossier and still told the FISA courts the info had been vetted when getting warrants to spy on Trump campaign officials. Again the NY Times and others don't talk about that now. The documents have been released...but the people who subscribe to these news organizations have no idea because these organization refuse to cover these rather important details.
I could go on and on.
This happens all the time. And you can tell who gets their news from a variety of sources across the spectrum vs someone who gets it from one side. You find time and time again they have a rather incomplete view of the issue/facts/etc.
So it is you who is ignorant to the facts because you do not bother to check and verify what you are reading/watching. You are ignorant because you are only getting "news" from organizations that don't actually bother to report all the facts.
Actually I will type slowly for you since you fail to understand.
The press you talk about routinely ignores news items. Take the Russian hoax. AP, Reuters, etc all published countless stories of the walls closing in, the latest story about what appears to be more Trump Russia collusion, etc, etc. They did it for years.
Now the government is releasing documents that show a vastly different story about what actually happened. Almost all of it showing how wrong these news organizations were. Documents showing how badly people in the government failed/misbehaved. And I notice time and time again when you go to the various sites...AP, NY Times, etc. they don't even mention them. People who only use those as their news sources are completely in the dark related to the latest news.
Take the senate report released last week (or the week before) that has financial records of the wife of the mayor of Moscow wiring 3.5 million to Hunter Biden as just one example. You certainly wouldn't know much about if you read the NY Times.
They produced one story about the report.
And in it made no mention of the business deals and sums of money Hunter received from Russian, Chinese, etc interests. No mention of that. Same thing with other mainstream press. How did the NY times cover for example Bidens son receiving 3.5 million? How did they talk about other financial deals?
With exactly one sentence: "The report released on Wednesday by the Senate Homeland Security Committee asserted that Hunter Biden traded on his father’s name to close lucrative business deals around the world."
That is the extent of their analysis of what the report detailed regarding Hunter's biz dealings.
As such their subscribers are missing rather important information regarding the family and how they receive a lot of money from other countries.
So they (you) are left in the dark. If as the press was warning during the Russian collusion hoax it is bad to receive help/money from them (the Russians)...then certainly it should be newsworthy that the nominee for Pres on the Dem side has a son who received millions of dollars from Russians.
If Russian influence is bad...then the press should report that the sub source that Steele used for his dossier was a person who US intelligence had been investigating because they were concerned he was a Russian spy. If you read the NY Times, AP, etc you will not find that information. That information has come out in gov documents over the past month or two.
Further the FBI knew this guy was the source of much of the Steele dossier and still told the FISA courts the info had been vetted when getting warrants to spy on Trump campaign officials. Again the NY Times and others don't talk about that now. The documents have been released...but the people who subscribe to these news organizations have no idea because these organization refuse to cover these rather important details.
I could go on and on.
This happens all the time. And you can tell who gets their news from a variety of sources across the spectrum vs someone who gets it from one side. You find time and time again they have a rather incomplete view of the issue/facts/etc.
So it is you who is ignorant to the facts because you do not bother to check and verify what you are reading/watching. You are ignorant because you are only getting "news" from organizations that don't actually bother to report all the facts.
What we also have, besides these venerable news organizations all over the world that you don't believe in (LOL), is an American justice system that penalizes people, including public officials and those who work for them, with fines and jail time, etc.. Based upon what the justice system has shown us about Trump and Co., you probably don't believe in that either.
Lastly, we have a voting public. In 3 1/2 weeks or so, they will let us know their views on Trump VS. Obama's 77-yr-old VP.
Because you're shockingly stupid and ignorant, I expect you not to believe those results either.
If people like you, saying such stupid shit about what they choose to believe, didn't actually exist, nobody would believe they did!
Actually I will type slowly for you since you fail to understand.
The press you talk about routinely ignores news items. Take the Russian hoax. AP, Reuters, etc all published countless stories of the walls closing in, the latest story about what appears to be more Trump Russia collusion, etc, etc. They did it for years.
Now the government is releasing documents that show a vastly different story about what actually happened. Almost all of it showing how wrong these news organizations were. Documents showing how badly people in the government failed/misbehaved. And I notice time and time again when you go to the various sites...AP, NY Times, etc. they don't even mention them. People who only use those as their news sources are completely in the dark related to the latest news.
Take the senate report released last week (or the week before) that has financial records of the wife of the mayor of Moscow wiring 3.5 million to Hunter Biden as just one example. You certainly wouldn't know much about if you read the NY Times.
They produced one story about the report.
And in it made no mention of the business deals and sums of money Hunter received from Russian, Chinese, etc interests. No mention of that. Same thing with other mainstream press. How did the NY times cover for example Bidens son receiving 3.5 million? How did they talk about other financial deals?
With exactly one sentence: "The report released on Wednesday by the Senate Homeland Security Committee asserted that Hunter Biden traded on his father’s name to close lucrative business deals around the world."
That is the extent of their analysis of what the report detailed regarding Hunter's biz dealings.
As such their subscribers are missing rather important information regarding the family and how they receive a lot of money from other countries.
So they (you) are left in the dark. If as the press was warning during the Russian collusion hoax it is bad to receive help/money from them (the Russians)...then certainly it should be newsworthy that the nominee for Pres on the Dem side has a son who received millions of dollars from Russians.
If Russian influence is bad...then the press should report that the sub source that Steele used for his dossier was a person who US intelligence had been investigating because they were concerned he was a Russian spy. If you read the NY Times, AP, etc you will not find that information. That information has come out in gov documents over the past month or two.
Further the FBI knew this guy was the source of much of the Steele dossier and still told the FISA courts the info had been vetted when getting warrants to spy on Trump campaign officials. Again the NY Times and others don't talk about that now. The documents have been released...but the people who subscribe to these news organizations have no idea because these organization refuse to cover these rather important details.
I could go on and on.
This happens all the time. And you can tell who gets their news from a variety of sources across the spectrum vs someone who gets it from one side. You find time and time again they have a rather incomplete view of the issue/facts/etc.
So it is you who is ignorant to the facts because you do not bother to check and verify what you are reading/watching. You are ignorant because you are only getting "news" from organizations that don't actually bother to report all the facts.
For example, I learned from the news that Trump was actually fined 25 Million Dollars for FRAUD in connection with duping people to pay the tuition for Trump U under false pretenses. Do you believe that happened?
I also learned from the evil news media that The Trump Foundation was shut down, and paid a $2 million penalty because, get this, the family was using charitable contributions sent to the Foundation for personal and business purposes and not charitable purposes, as required for foundations. Do you believe this?
C’mon, tell us you don’t believe those things.
Desert Hound
DA
And again the problem is your news is rather one sided. You do get reporting on stuff like the fine for 25 million. What do don't get reporting on is for instance the report that the Hunter received 3.5 million.
So you make my point in a sense. You hear one sort of story, but are ignorant on the other. In other words the news you follow give you an incomplete view of the various political figures and their family finances.
What was the judicial penalty given to Joe Biden’s son? Please let me know.
We know what happened to Manafort and Gates and Roger Stone, don’t we? And what is happening now with Steve Bannon, correct? Judicial processes.
What charges have been brought concerning Hunter Biden?
Do you even understand the difference? Or has your head decided on the wrongdoing, as distinguished from the American judicial system or the voters.
That’s an interesting world view.
Another question. Was the Clinton Foundation shut down for wrongdoing? Is it active?
Bill Clinton was disbarred, but for lying about a blow job.
Actually I will type slowly for you since you fail to understand.
The press you talk about routinely ignores news items. Take the Russian hoax. AP, Reuters, etc all published countless stories of the walls closing in, the latest story about what appears to be more Trump Russia collusion, etc, etc. They did it for years.
Now the government is releasing documents that show a vastly different story about what actually happened. Almost all of it showing how wrong these news organizations were. Documents showing how badly people in the government failed/misbehaved. And I notice time and time again when you go to the various sites...AP, NY Times, etc. they don't even mention them. People who only use those as their news sources are completely in the dark related to the latest news.
Take the senate report released last week (or the week before) that has financial records of the wife of the mayor of Moscow wiring 3.5 million to Hunter Biden as just one example. You certainly wouldn't know much about if you read the NY Times.
They produced one story about the report.
And in it made no mention of the business deals and sums of money Hunter received from Russian, Chinese, etc interests. No mention of that. Same thing with other mainstream press. How did the NY times cover for example Bidens son receiving 3.5 million? How did they talk about other financial deals?
With exactly one sentence: "The report released on Wednesday by the Senate Homeland Security Committee asserted that Hunter Biden traded on his father’s name to close lucrative business deals around the world."
That is the extent of their analysis of what the report detailed regarding Hunter's biz dealings.
As such their subscribers are missing rather important information regarding the family and how they receive a lot of money from other countries.
So they (you) are left in the dark. If as the press was warning during the Russian collusion hoax it is bad to receive help/money from them (the Russians)...then certainly it should be newsworthy that the nominee for Pres on the Dem side has a son who received millions of dollars from Russians.
If Russian influence is bad...then the press should report that the sub source that Steele used for his dossier was a person who US intelligence had been investigating because they were concerned he was a Russian spy. If you read the NY Times, AP, etc you will not find that information. That information has come out in gov documents over the past month or two.
Further the FBI knew this guy was the source of much of the Steele dossier and still told the FISA courts the info had been vetted when getting warrants to spy on Trump campaign officials. Again the NY Times and others don't talk about that now. The documents have been released...but the people who subscribe to these news organizations have no idea because these organization refuse to cover these rather important details.
I could go on and on.
This happens all the time. And you can tell who gets their news from a variety of sources across the spectrum vs someone who gets it from one side. You find time and time again they have a rather incomplete view of the issue/facts/etc.
So it is you who is ignorant to the facts because you do not bother to check and verify what you are reading/watching. You are ignorant because you are only getting "news" from organizations that don't actually bother to report all the facts.
Perhaps if you type even slower you will understand what you are writing.
So now I read that NC, Ohio and AZ are looking blue?!
Must be fake news because it was in reputable sources of media...ya know, the type that win Pulitzers and break stories with all their fake information.
Trump knows the real score.
America is waking up to this cretin.
Let's go!
Must be fake news because it was in reputable sources of media...ya know, the type that win Pulitzers and break stories with all their fake information.
Trump knows the real score.
America is waking up to this cretin.
Let's go!
Sheriff Joe
DA
Sheriff Joe
DA
It’s his fucking house.
Sheriff Joe
DA
So religion and guns have been around for a long time also and we know you would get rid of them right now if you could.
Amazing what part of the constitution you want to keep.
It’s a package deal.
Sheriff Joe
DA
My favorite part about the mention of guns in there is “a well-organized militia...”
And everybody’s free to practice any stupid religion they want...you can do your Muslim thing all day, it’s a guaranteed right.