Sheriff Joe
DA
Did you read it or e-read it?
Pay attention.
The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread
- Thread starter Nonononono
- Start date
Pay attention.
Sheriff Joe
DA
'If he becomes nominee, I'm moving to another country'...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...942340-bdb1-11e8-8792-78719177250f_story.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...942340-bdb1-11e8-8792-78719177250f_story.html
Sheriff Joe
DA
Lawyer Caught On Camera: 'Going To Resist'...
https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/21/kavanaugh-lawyer-debra-katz-resist-rally/
S
KAVANAUGH ACCUSER’S LAWYER CAUGHT ON CAMERA: ‘WE ARE GOING TO RESIST’
3:24 PM 09/21/2018
Amber Athey | Media and Breaking News Editor
So she's a kook.
Debra Katz, one of the attorneys representing Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser, attended a resistance rally against the president in 2017 and promised to “fight back.”
WATCH:
Katz is representing Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who claims Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in the 1980s while the two were in high school.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
The lawyer has numerous ties to the resistance against Trump, and was caught on camera at a protest in February 2017 after Jeff Sessions was confirmed as the administration’s attorney general.
“We are going to fight back,” she told a reporter. “We are going to resist. We will not be silenced.”
Katz was identified only as a “protester” by ABC’s “Good Morning America.”
The Gargoyle, the alumni magazine for the University of Wisconsin Law School, profiled Katz on August 9, 2018 and found her to be just as committed to fighting the president as she was at the 2017 protest.
“The resistance is not going away, says Katz, and she is committed to being part of it,” the Gargoyle wrote.
“When I go to a march on behalf of Dreamers, I hear young people making connections between DACA and Islamophobia,” Katz told the magazine. “I hope that energy continues, to retake our democracy that is truly at risk now.”
Katz and her colleague Lisa Banks were also prepared to headline a fundraiser for Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin in October until they were asked about the event by CNN. Katz claimed the event was planned long before Dr. Ford came forward against Kavanaugh and referred to an invitation for the fundraiser sent out Thursday morning as an “old invite.” (RELATED: Kavanaugh Accuser’s Lawyers Pull Out Of Democratic Fundraiser)
The event was set to be held at the attorneys’ law firm.
“The short answer is this: We did a fundraiser for Sen. Baldwin six years ago when we ran for the Senate, we supported her then,” Katz told CNN. “We are not going to be doing a fundraiser now. We’re going to be focused on the issues involving the Kavanaugh confirmation process.”
https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/21/kavanaugh-lawyer-debra-katz-resist-rally/
S
KAVANAUGH ACCUSER’S LAWYER CAUGHT ON CAMERA: ‘WE ARE GOING TO RESIST’
3:24 PM 09/21/2018
Amber Athey | Media and Breaking News Editor
So she's a kook.
Debra Katz, one of the attorneys representing Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser, attended a resistance rally against the president in 2017 and promised to “fight back.”
WATCH:
Katz is representing Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who claims Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in the 1980s while the two were in high school.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
The lawyer has numerous ties to the resistance against Trump, and was caught on camera at a protest in February 2017 after Jeff Sessions was confirmed as the administration’s attorney general.
“We are going to fight back,” she told a reporter. “We are going to resist. We will not be silenced.”
Katz was identified only as a “protester” by ABC’s “Good Morning America.”
The Gargoyle, the alumni magazine for the University of Wisconsin Law School, profiled Katz on August 9, 2018 and found her to be just as committed to fighting the president as she was at the 2017 protest.
“The resistance is not going away, says Katz, and she is committed to being part of it,” the Gargoyle wrote.
“When I go to a march on behalf of Dreamers, I hear young people making connections between DACA and Islamophobia,” Katz told the magazine. “I hope that energy continues, to retake our democracy that is truly at risk now.”
Katz and her colleague Lisa Banks were also prepared to headline a fundraiser for Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin in October until they were asked about the event by CNN. Katz claimed the event was planned long before Dr. Ford came forward against Kavanaugh and referred to an invitation for the fundraiser sent out Thursday morning as an “old invite.” (RELATED: Kavanaugh Accuser’s Lawyers Pull Out Of Democratic Fundraiser)
The event was set to be held at the attorneys’ law firm.
“The short answer is this: We did a fundraiser for Sen. Baldwin six years ago when we ran for the Senate, we supported her then,” Katz told CNN. “We are not going to be doing a fundraiser now. We’re going to be focused on the issues involving the Kavanaugh confirmation process.”
So at a trial one is presumed innocent until proven guilty & at a confirmation hearing one is presumed guilty until proven innocent?
Interesting.....
This goes a long way to understanding the PC left and their obsession with labeling folks racist, nazis, traitors, rapists...in their mind these folks are guilty until they PROVE themselves innocent.
Legal scholars one and all.
Sheriff Joe
DA
We are talking to the Kevin Spacey sympathizer.
Absurd. You, like racist Joe, simply don't understand or are willfully stupid.
A confirmation hearing is about suitability for the job and getting enough Senators to confirm you. That is why Merrick Garland, despite not having any proved or even alleged illegalities, was not confirmed: He couldn't get the votes in the Senate.
DKE Kav, right now, likely does not have the votes, or Grassley and McCreeper would shut this down. Or, at the very least, they believe the accusations (and other evidence) will prove damning enough that it will hurt GOP congress candidates in Nov.
If there was nothing here, and Grassley and McCreeper were confident of no fallout, they would hold the vote. But there is absolutely 0 precedent that executive branch nominees must be given judicial level due process for confirmation. Not getting promoted from a federal judgeship to Scotus is in no way the same as taking a person's liberty or causing financial pain (ie. fines.) To not understand that is to be, truly, as dumb as a rock.
Sheriff Joe
DA
So Mr babbler, will he be confirmed?
Fuck you.
You are the one that doesn't understand. You arrogant piece of shit.
The only thing this man has going against him is that Trump nominated him...
Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh is “well qualified” to hold a seat on the Supreme Court, the American Bar Association said Friday, giving President Trump’s nominee another boost heading into next week’s confirmation hearing.
The ABA’s federal judiciary committee gave its unanimous rating to Judge Kavanaugh, who has sat for a dozen years on the circuit court of appeals in Washington, earning high marks for his approach to judging.
Though conservatives don’t put as much stock in the rating from the liberal-leaning ABA, Democrats have called it the “gold standard” for evaluating whether a judge should be confirmed.
The rating is based on peer reviews and evaluations, and judges candidates on their integrity, professional competence and judicial temperament. It does not consider ideology, philosophy or political affiliation.
A spokesperson from the ABA will testify at Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing about his evaluation next Friday.
ABA also gave Mr. Trump’s first nominee to the high court Justice Neil M. Gorsuch a unanimous well-qualified rating.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/aug/31/american-bar-association-gives-brett-kavanaugh-una/
Yes, she should bring her police report of the incident along with all the eye witnesses and collaborating evidence.
Collaborating? Oh, I get it.
There are three votes of concern here. The first is the committee recommendation vote - bet on 11-10 win for K unless Ford has surprises or he fumbles his response testimony. Then there is the confirmation vote in the Senate. I assume that McC will have a firm count of votes and will not allow it to proceed unless K will win. Then there is the November vote, when voters nationwide will remember the results of this little psychology experiment.
Don't need to.
She just hired a fairly well regarded attorney out of the SDNY.
This will be simple for the simpletons. Collins and Murkowski think they can weather this (or don't care about re-election) or they don't.
RNC (of Broidy/Cohen fame)/Federalists/Kochs/Mercers will either think the price of DKE Kav confirmation is too high or they won't.
Barrett or Lee would be my bet, if I was a betting man who needed mysterious donors to pay off my gambling debts... sorry for getting so hot.
You seem triggered.
You're a dim bulb and you're short tempered.
So you make me laugh a lot.
Thanks!
Sheriff Joe
DA
So, your bluster aside will he or won't he?
Hüsker Dü
DA
You you take all this political stuff deeply personal. Maybe take your chair outside and get some fresh air, maybe go see how people actually live not the am radio or other hard right site version. Real people living real life.
No one is talking to you Daffy...
Put your dunce cap back on and go sit in the corner.
So we have become so PC that all one has to do to ruin a persons reputation or deny them a position on the SCOTUS is accuse them of malfeasance.
No proof necessary, just make an accusation...something Joe McCarthy would understand.
You're an arrogant turd who thinks way to highly of himself...I shake my head in disbelief.
You're welcome.