U15/05 Girls Academy/ECNL WNT Pool

It’s worth noting that of the 10 ‘05 ECNL players that are invited to the NorCal NTC on 3/10, 2 are players that have been in the YNT pool for a couple years already. 3 more of those have been attending NTC’s for a long time.

I’ve been able to watch this group closely over the past 4 years and the NorCal NTC’s have always had a good number of ECNL players. Additionally, there are always a few new faces in there. A large number of the strong players in the area have been able to attend NTC at least once.
Yeah it’s strange how things work with DA and ECNL. Both great clubs I might add but I think US soccer tends to all give ECNL players enough recognition because there DOC wouldn’t get on board and sign there club in DA. US soccer is slapping these ECNL clubs hand and not allowing players to NT training camps. I could be wrong but it totally seems that way. Some DA clubs should reconsider some of these players chosen to the pool. If they truly have US soccer scout really watching these games and this is the selection pool there choosing - then it’s totally political with the DA clubs. I even hear in Socal some DA coaches recruit kids to there club saying if you join I can get you an opportunity with then NTC. Not right! Not right at all!
 
Yeah it’s strange how things work with DA and ECNL. Both great clubs I might add but I think US soccer tends to all give ECNL players enough recognition because there DOC wouldn’t get on board and sign there club in DA. US soccer is slapping these ECNL clubs hand and not allowing players to NT training camps. I could be wrong but it totally seems that way. Some DA clubs should reconsider some of these players chosen to the pool. If they truly have US soccer scout really watching these games and this is the selection pool there choosing - then it’s totally political with the DA clubs. I even hear in Socal some DA coaches recruit kids to there club saying if you join I can get you an opportunity with then NTC. Not right! Not right at all!
We might have different perspectives on this one.
 
We might have different perspectives on this one.
@Soccerfan2- I have no facts to back this up. Its just my opinion and things I've heard over the years. I could be totally wrong and I hope I am. Both clubs should have the best girls representing there clubs. These girls work to hard not to get an invite because we all know 70% of players on these list won't be around at U19/U20. So let these girls enjoy these little opportunities and hopefully the experience will turn these women into great college students. That should be there end goal.
 
The most likely reason for any perceived bias towards the DA is because the selection criteria isn't primarily about identifying and developing "who is the best player today" but rather "who has the most potential to become a full YNT player."

US Soccer knows a U15 girl who is slated to train 4 days a week for 10 months a year at a high level (DA) for each of the next four years is going to better fulfill their potential than a girl slated to train 3 days a week for 7 months a year at a high level (ECNL) plus another 3 months of high school soccer for each of the next 4 years.

Common sense tells you the first environment is much more likely to maximize a player's development, and the last decade of experience with the boys has proven that very few elite players come up through the high school pathway anymore when such a large number of others are following the more intensive DA pathway.
 
The most likely reason for any perceived bias towards the DA is because the selection criteria isn't primarily about identifying and developing "who is the best player today" but rather "who has the most potential to become a full YNT player."

US Soccer knows a U15 girl who is slated to train 4 days a week for 10 months a year at a high level (DA) for each of the next four years is going to better fulfill their potential than a girl slated to train 3 days a week for 7 months a year at a high level (ECNL) plus another 3 months of high school soccer for each of the next 4 years.

Common sense tells you the first environment is much more likely to maximize a player's development, and the last decade of experience with the boys has proven that very few elite players come up through the high school pathway anymore when such a large number of others are following the more intensive DA pathway.

It is also true that there much greater opportunities for boys that can justify the sacrifices demanded by the DA pathway (such as no HS soccer), both in terms of the number of professional opportunities and the quality of them (I.e. $$$). For girls, it's the same sacrifice but without the same sized rewards at the end. There's far fewer pro opportunities and obviously much less money to be made for all but genuine unicorns.

The powers that be don't care about that as they're required to 1) try and produce winning YNT teams, and 2) not get sued because should they support a pathway for boys and not girls.
 
Congrats to the talented DDs on this list....and this is not meant to take away at all from their AWESOME recognition.......5 So'Cal '05 made the YNT....that is O.K. but I would like to know U.S. Soccers justification for how zero of these 5 play for the LAFC Slammers G'05 team....once these goats get to college they will dominate and show how political this KIDS game has gotten to be when they get the call to THE BIG TEAM......
I notice that there are no LAFC Slammers players on the 2020 id2 roster either. Does it make sense to expect that players that aren’t sorted to the top of the ECNL group (where they don’t even have to compete w DA players) should expect to go through to YNT?
 
I notice that there are no LAFC Slammers players on the 2020 id2 roster either. Does it make sense to expect that players that aren’t sorted to the top of the ECNL group (where they don’t even have to compete w DA players) should expect to go through to YNT?
Where do you get the mistaken idea that the top players in ECNL go to id2?
 
The most likely reason for any perceived bias towards the DA is because the selection criteria isn't primarily about identifying and developing "who is the best player today" but rather "who has the most potential to become a full YNT player."

US Soccer knows a U15 girl who is slated to train 4 days a week for 10 months a year at a high level (DA) for each of the next four years is going to better fulfill their potential than a girl slated to train 3 days a week for 7 months a year at a high level (ECNL) plus another 3 months of high school soccer for each of the next 4 years.

Common sense tells you the first environment is much more likely to maximize a player's development, and the last decade of experience with the boys has proven that very few elite players come up through the high school pathway anymore when such a large number of others are following the more intensive DA pathway.
To expand on that, there is an entirely new staff that has only been in place for a few months....they have to start somewhere
 
To expand on that, there is an entirely new staff that has only been in place for a few months....they have to start somewhere

Sure. But I think if playing on a YNT is a player's primary goal, the pathway that will likely maximize the possibility is quite clear. There are very valid reasons not to choose it (and for many unfortunately the DA isn't even an option). But for the most part, I do think people should limit the whining about the impact their own personal decisions are having on themselves when the pros and cons of that decision are perfectly obvious.
 
Obviously you can't/won't answer the question, but nice strawman there and to attempt to deflect. Keep drinking the kool aid.
My point is just that there is always selection bias in any system. If there were some obvious standout players that got passed over on YNT due to politics or whatever, why don’t those players show up elsewhere? I see just 4 players from that team in ODP and none in id2. Are they opting out? I do remember one player from that team from ODP when the girls were younger. Mine is mostly an outsider’s perspective as I don’t know the SoCal player pool well enough. Maybe there is valid answer to this question.
I can tell you that having had a close up view of the process in NorCal, the two obvious standout players in this age group were picked out early (one before she even played DA and the other was ECNL). After that, it’s not so obvious, and certainly the DA selection bias is going to effect choices from that less than obvious group.
 
Yeah it’s strange how things work with DA and ECNL. Both great clubs I might add but I think US soccer tends to all give ECNL players enough recognition because there DOC wouldn’t get on board and sign there club in DA. US soccer is slapping these ECNL clubs hand and not allowing players to NT training camps. I could be wrong but it totally seems that way. Some DA clubs should reconsider some of these players chosen to the pool. If they truly have US soccer scout really watching these games and this is the selection pool there choosing - then it’s totally political with the DA clubs. I even hear in Socal some DA coaches recruit kids to there club saying if you join I can get you an opportunity with then NTC. Not right! Not right at all!
What?
 
The most likely reason for any perceived bias towards the DA is because the selection criteria isn't primarily about identifying and developing "who is the best player today" but rather "who has the most potential to become a full YNT player."

US Soccer knows a U15 girl who is slated to train 4 days a week for 10 months a year at a high level (DA) for each of the next four years is going to better fulfill their potential than a girl slated to train 3 days a week for 7 months a year at a high level (ECNL) plus another 3 months of high school soccer for each of the next 4 years.

Common sense tells you the first environment is much more likely to maximize a player's development, and the last decade of experience with the boys has proven that very few elite players come up through the high school pathway anymore when such a large number of others are following the more intensive DA pathway.
BC!!! I don;t like your common sense at all Timmyh. Who determines "who will be the best player" of the future that has potential? There are some big time HS School soccer boys out of Texas that have done very well for themselves in the pros. They can;t afford private school so their locked out of the DA as well. HS Soccer is important to some of us. Ramos is down there now too. The men SUCK if you haven;t heard, so any reference to their debacle as any success of DA is bad imo. What has the DA produced for the men sir? I can;t watch MLS for obvious reasons. The woman are proven winners and I believe regardless of DA or ECNL players, they will win with the olders. It;s funny to hear you share how one player is different than the other. My dd has done both DA and ECNL. The top top players who are hard core and actually have a slight chance to be world-class soccer players will always be good. Plus, 4 days week is a joke and most are not really doing it. Trust me!!! The only ones are the ones on the list. My dd does two days week with ECNL, plus privates, (Jason SDA) and the great Von Ronham out of Denmark and then a personal speed and nutritionist specialist that my dd sees once a week to watch what shes eating and make sure she keeps her speed. On top of that, she runs and dribbles on the beach with her soccer ball three times a week. And to think she came from being a Part Time Player in the DA all the way to a starter on ECNL. I'm proud of how hard she has worked and blossomed into the player she is today. Coach Ronham believes with continued hard work she might finally get her call up to the training center and get another try......lol
 
BC!!! I don;t like your common sense at all Timmyh. Who determines "who will be the best player" of the future that has potential? There are some big time HS School soccer boys out of Texas that have done very well for themselves in the pros. They can;t afford private school so their locked out of the DA as well. HS Soccer is important to some of us. Ramos is down there now too. The men SUCK if you haven;t heard, so any reference to their debacle as any success of DA is bad imo. What has the DA produced for the men sir? I can;t watch MLS for obvious reasons. The woman are proven winners and I believe regardless of DA or ECNL players, they will win with the olders. It;s funny to hear you share how one player is different than the other. My dd has done both DA and ECNL. The top top players who are hard core and actually have a slight chance to be world-class soccer players will always be good. Plus, 4 days week is a joke and most are not really doing it. Trust me!!! The only ones are the ones on the list. My dd does two days week with ECNL, plus privates, (Jason SDA) and the great Von Ronham out of Denmark and then a personal speed and nutritionist specialist that my dd sees once a week to watch what shes eating and make sure she keeps her speed. On top of that, she runs and dribbles on the beach with her soccer ball three times a week. And to think she came from being a Part Time Player in the DA all the way to a starter on ECNL. I'm proud of how hard she has worked and blossomed into the player she is today. Coach Ronham believes with continued hard work she might finally get her call up to the training center and get another try......lol

Wait? Your dd does two days week with ECNL, plus privates, (Jason SDA) and then finds time for a personal speed and nutritionist specialist once a week to watch what shes eating and make sure she keeps her speed. On top of that, she runs and dribbles on the beach with her soccer ball three times a week? Sounds like 4 days a week to me and then some! Becareful not to over train. Glad she’s found a home.
 
My point is just that there is always selection bias in any system. If there were some obvious standout players that got passed over on YNT due to politics or whatever, why don’t those players show up elsewhere? I see just 4 players from that team in ODP and none in id2. Are they opting out? I do remember one player from that team from ODP when the girls were younger. Mine is mostly an outsider’s perspective as I don’t know the SoCal player pool well enough. Maybe there is valid answer to this question.
I can tell you that having had a close up view of the process in NorCal, the two obvious standout players in this age group were picked out early (one before she even played DA and the other was ECNL). After that, it’s not so obvious, and certainly the DA selection bias is going to effect choices from that less than obvious group.

Yes, this is pretty much my perspective. US soccer has a strong incentive to select their players from their DA program.
 
The most likely reason for any perceived bias towards the DA is because the selection criteria isn't primarily about identifying and developing "who is the best player today" but rather "who has the most potential to become a full YNT player."

US Soccer knows a U15 girl who is slated to train 4 days a week for 10 months a year at a high level (DA) for each of the next four years is going to better fulfill their potential than a girl slated to train 3 days a week for 7 months a year at a high level (ECNL) plus another 3 months of high school soccer for each of the next 4 years.

Common sense tells you the first environment is much more likely to maximize a player's development, and the last decade of experience with the boys has proven that very few elite players come up through the high school pathway anymore when such a large number of others are following the more intensive DA pathway.
Maybe DA's sense, but certainly not common sense outside their world. There's no hard data, studies, evidence etc. that the more restrictive DA training structure and league format produces better girls/women players. Just US Soccer saying so. In fact, there is proof to suggest that a long-term environment with a little less soccer or a longer break each year reduces burnout and improves injury-risk rates. Burnout especially in SoCal where we have year-round weather and are not forced by Mother Nature into alternative programming like indoor or futsal or cancelled weeks due to snow, etc. Also, factor in that many sports experts are of the opinion that a multisport athlete will be better longer term at soccer (eg, a high school soccer player who also plays basketball, hockey, runs track). Last, consider that all the women on the USWNT to date have made it to their level (better than all the other players in the World) without the current DA program, by playing multiple sports, and with some freedom of personal choice through their teens.

The boys side has a bigger disparity of team quality between DA and ECNL, so I would agree with your past 10 years statement for the boys. But that is beginning to change as well.

ECNL and DA girls are comparable leagues--both having strong teams and weak teams. Both play about an equal number of games throughout the year. Both have college showcases to be recruited into the same programs at the next level. One gives its players a couple more months of freedom away from its league. For girls, that annual personal choice is a value-add in my book. Maybe you disagree, and that's fine, but neither of us can say definitively that one league is or will produce better players than the other. That's marketing hype, which is always easy to fall victim to in our hyper-competitive youth sports scene.

PS - Don't forget to wash your hands :)
 
Where do you get the mistaken idea that the top players in ECNL go to id2?
All this is so easy to figure out. The non competitive dads who never really fought for a spot on a team, try and bring in really stupid arguments. Like others have said, we will all look back and see how and who the scouts picked. Crap, my dd chose HS Soccer and is no longer developable. She went to one TC Camp back in 2016 and was never invited back from the TC Camp Director and US National team staff member ,plus he was the head Doc at the DA Girls Academy in San Diego.
 
Maybe DA's sense, but certainly not common sense outside their world. There's no hard data, studies, evidence etc. that the more restrictive DA training structure and league format produces better girls/women players. Just US Soccer saying so. In fact, there is proof to suggest that a long-term environment with a little less soccer or a longer break each year reduces burnout and improves injury-risk rates. Burnout especially in SoCal where we have year-round weather and are not forced by Mother Nature into alternative programming like indoor or futsal or cancelled weeks due to snow, etc. Also, factor in that many sports experts are of the opinion that a multisport athlete will be better longer term at soccer (eg, a high school soccer player who also plays basketball, hockey, runs track). Last, consider that all the women on the USWNT to date have made it to their level (better than all the other players in the World) without the current DA program, by playing multiple sports, and with some freedom of personal choice through their teens.

The boys side has a bigger disparity of team quality between DA and ECNL, so I would agree with your past 10 years statement for the boys. But that is beginning to change as well.

ECNL and DA girls are comparable leagues--both having strong teams and weak teams. Both play about an equal number of games throughout the year. Both have college showcases to be recruited into the same programs at the next level. One gives its players a couple more months of freedom away from its league. For girls, that annual personal choice is a value-add in my book. Maybe you disagree, and that's fine, but neither of us can say definitively that one league is or will produce better players than the other. That's marketing hype, which is always easy to fall victim to in our hyper-competitive youth sports scene.

PS - Don't forget to wash your hands :)

Great post.....one point to add about the boys, the DA has not made them world class or even close to it as of yet....they're better than than the BoysECNL teams as they have much better prospects and players, hs is not as valued socially, plus there is a pathway to play in the MLS or beyond.....so many differences with girls and boys routes to the top it's hard to compare.....
 
Back
Top