Some data on Covid-19 and why we're not over reacting...

Absolutely. And I want you gone the day we hit 12,000, with an apologetic farewell about how you don't believe scientific and medical experts and that makes you ignorant. I will sign off and acknowledge my closed-minded arrogance for believing the "experts" on 7/31 if we are not at 12,000 deceased in the US.
Although I tend to agree with you, you have ended up on the wrong side of the bet. I pray the troll wins in this case . . . first time for everything.
 
That's a loaded question. I don't like anyone dying. but what does that make you look like when you care more about a virus that is dangerous to your age group than a virus like the swine flu and seasonal flu that kills more people?
You still don't get it do you?
 
We have no herd immunity nor vaccine. So left unchecked this would go well past your numbers, period. I will listen to the experts. Not idiots like you who believe what trump says.
the experts also said 56% of California would get infected. they significantly lowered that assessment.
 
We have programs to limit the effect of the seasonal flu. Imagine what those numbers would be like if there were no herd immunity from previous infections, no specific vaccines, and no proven cures available.
listen to what you are saying. we have programs to limit the effect of the seasonal flu. we have vaccines for the flu. You are worried about a virus that is no where near as fatal seasonal flu with all its protective measures.
 
Absolutely. And I want you gone the day we hit 12,000, with an apologetic farewell about how you don't believe scientific and medical experts and that makes you ignorant. I will sign off and acknowledge my closed-minded arrogance for believing the "experts" on 7/31 if we are not at 12,000 deceased in the US.
you got yourself a bet. don't change your name either to get back on here. lol.
 
You still don't get it do you?
I get the fact that the coronavirus is no where near as lethal as your "experts" say. we will be no where near 12k let alone 40k dead in 1 year. Ive been saying that since the beginning. We didn't even lockdown until after Febrary, Peak Virus season. We'll see whos right, and who has excuses ready.
 
I guess the extreme measures are working.
no, February is the peak virus month. We didn't lock down until after that. it can take up 2 weeks to show symptoms which we are seeing now. It might have helped, but was not needed. Lockdown the vulnerable. let the healthy people with over 90% survivability continue to work and build up antibodies if they get it. community immunity.
 
That's a loaded question. I don't like anyone dying. but what does that make you look like when you care more about a virus that is dangerous to your age group than a virus like the swine flu and seasonal flu that kills more people?

Would you like another attempt at whatever it is that you are trying to say there?
 
Would you like another attempt at whatever it is that you are trying to say there?
no, the only monster is a senior citizen only caring about people dying when its his age group that's affected. 80% of swine flu victims were under 65. no wonder you didn't care.
 
no, February is the peak virus month. We didn't lock down until after that. it can take up 2 weeks to show symptoms which we are seeing now. It might have helped, but was not needed. Lockdown the vulnerable. let the healthy people with over 90% survivability continue to work and build up antibodies if they get it. community immunity.
Again, I will defer to the experts.
 
listen to what you are saying. we have programs to limit the effect of the seasonal flu. we have vaccines for the flu. You are worried about a virus that is no where near as fatal seasonal flu with all its protective measures.

Besides your orange leader and his minions, what evidence do you have to back that up?

Actual numbers from the infection in China show a 3% to 4% fatality rate for those infected - and we now have more infected than China, despite their hugely bigger population. How did they control the spread? They shut down a large portion their country.
 
no, the only monster is a senior citizen only caring about people dying when its his age group that's affected. 80% of swine flu victims were under 65. no wonder you didn't care.

You're babbling. You would apply for a job in the White House.
 
Besides your orange leader and his minions, what evidence do you have to back that up?

Actual numbers from the infection in China show a 3% to 4% fatality rate for those infected - and we now have more infected than China, despite their hugely bigger population. How did they control the spread? They shut down a large portion their country.
China is different from the U.S. Even the CDC has a much lower fatality rate for the coronavirus. And the percentage continues to fall as more people get tested. Do you disagree with the CDC?
 
You're babbling. You would apply for a job in the White House.
I'm not lying, you think the coronavirus is worse than the swine flu and seasonal flu. Lets see. "bump" me in a year. We're going in circles as the fatality rate, projected infected, and projected killed numbers continue to drop.
 
I'm not lying, you think the coronavirus is worse than the swine flu and seasonal flu. Lets see. "bump" me in a year. We're going in circles as the fatality rate, projected infected, and projected killed numbers continue to drop.

You have been ignoring what I post and continuing with your strawman attacks on me.
 
Back
Top