Impeachment Hearings

Ricky Fandango said:
Anyone know when the Mueller report is coming out?
That should settle things once and for all.

Let me know, thanks.
Click to expand...

You know this post is kind of hysterical in a way, given the article I posted. But in the worst kind of way.
Guess if all I'd been shown on tv was clips of Trump declaring the Muellers papers clear him of all charges,
 
tenacious said:
I disagree. Schiff is really so articulate. Sort of like the HUD hearings in the 50's, there is going to be a stain. They might not play it on Fox News, but he just seems better at this, then anyone else I see in that chamber.
Click to expand...
Schiff wanting to deal is not a good sign for you people.
 
tenacious said:
I disagree. Schiff is really so articulate. Sort of like the HUD hearings in the 50's, there is going to be a stain. They might not play it on Fox News, but he just seems better at this, then anyone else I see in that chamber.
Click to expand...

Elizabeth Warren hit the grand slam today with her question about the integrity of the Supreme Court, the Senate, and the US Constitution - and thus forced CJ Roberts to read it out loud.
 
"I deliberately didn't talk about the facts" -- A. Dershowitz.

If your lawyer starts making comments like this, supposedly in your defense, you need a new lawyer. He seems to be taking Rudy's place as court jester on the impeachment defense team
 
ac·quit
/əˈkwit/
Learn to pronounce
verb
past tense: acquitted; past participle: acquitted
1.
free (someone) from a criminal charge by a verdict of not guilty.
 
When will the folks in DC realize they can pass legislation like Obama Care without bi partisan support...
But when it comes to impeaching a President, it just doesn't fly.

So who will the Democrats nominate to run against Trump?
Bernie or Liz ? Uncle Joe? Bloomberg?

How's your 401K doing?
Gonna be a good Super Bowl....go KC!
 
espola said:
"I deliberately didn't talk about the facts" -- A. Dershowitz.

If your lawyer starts making comments like this, supposedly in your defense, you need a new lawyer. He seems to be taking Rudy's place as court jester on the impeachment defense team
Click to expand...

STFU and finish " your " duty with Schiff......he's crying.
 
All those Senators who voted to exclude witnesses are now as guilty of a coverup as Nixon and his fellow convicts were.
 
The Democrats half assed their investigation in the House & expected the Senate to finish their investigation...
The House presented their case and failed to convince the majority that Trump committed treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

The Democrats want to change the Constitution regarding the electoral college...
Will the Democrats now want to change the Constitution to make it easier to impeach a President?
Those crazy socialist...what's next? Besides the election?
 
Lion Eyes said:
The Democrats half assed their investigation in the House & expected the Senate to finish their investigation...
The House presented their case and failed to convince the majority that Trump committed treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

The Democrats want to change the Constitution regarding the electoral college...
Will the Democrats now want to change the Constitution to make it easier to impeach a President?
Those crazy socialist...what's next? Besides the election?
Click to expand...

The House "half-assed" investigation was crippled by the WH refusal to obey subpoenas. That is one of the charges in the bill of impeachment. Didn't you read it? Or is that censored out of your news feed?

The defense presented by t's lawyers ranged from "nothing happened" to "Guilty - but what are you going to do about it". From the start of the process in the House hearings, it was a foreseeable conclusion that the House would impeach but that the Senate would not convict. Only some late-breaking facts could have changed that process. It appears that the Parnas and Bolton revelations were not enough.
 
Lion Eyes said:
The Democrats half assed their investigation in the House & expected the Senate to finish their investigation...
The House presented their case and failed to convince the majority that Trump committed treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

The Democrats want to change the Constitution regarding the electoral college...
Will the Democrats now want to change the Constitution to make it easier to impeach a President?
Those crazy socialist...what's next? Besides the election?
Click to expand...
WTF? Are you trapped in looney right wing echo chamber? Its all you know.
 
espola said:
The House "half-assed" investigation was crippled by the WH refusal to obey subpoenas. That is one of the charges in the bill of impeachment. Didn't you read it? Or is that censored out of your news feed?

The defense presented by t's lawyers ranged from "nothing happened" to "Guilty - but what are you going to do about it". From the start of the process in the House hearings, it was a foreseeable conclusion that the House would impeach but that the Senate would not convict. Only some late-breaking facts could have changed that process. It appears that the Parnas and Bolton revelations were not enough.
Click to expand...
Hey fuck you, you arrogant ass.
See Executive privilege...
See Obama - Fast & Furious
What's next you kool aid drinking ass wipe?
By the way espola, fuck you!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top