You keep having the same wet dreams....loser.
Impeachment Hearings
- Thread starter Booter
- Start date
QUOTE="espola, post: 307298, member: 3"
The House "half-assed" investigation was crippled by the WH refusal to obey subpoenas.
That is one of the charges in the bill of impeachment.
Didn't you read it?
Or is that censored out of your news feed?
The defense presented by t's lawyers ranged from "nothing happened" to "Guilty - but
what are you going to do about it". From the start of the process in the House hearings, it
was a foreseeable conclusion that the House would impeach but that the Senate would not convict.
Only some late-breaking facts could have changed that process.
It appears that the Parnas and Bolton revelations were not enough.
/QUOTE
Poor Poor Lying Thieving Spola.....
You just keep on telling yourself the " House " was crippled.....
Yep...that's the ticket.
Jerry ! Jerry ! JERRY ! .....
The women behind the desk could barely contain their LAUGHTER .......
Yep the Clown Show closed with the Clowns squabbling.
THERE'S YOUR " CRIPPLE "............!!!
The House "half-assed" investigation was crippled by the WH refusal to obey subpoenas.
That is one of the charges in the bill of impeachment.
Didn't you read it?
Or is that censored out of your news feed?
The defense presented by t's lawyers ranged from "nothing happened" to "Guilty - but
what are you going to do about it". From the start of the process in the House hearings, it
was a foreseeable conclusion that the House would impeach but that the Senate would not convict.
Only some late-breaking facts could have changed that process.
It appears that the Parnas and Bolton revelations were not enough.
/QUOTE
Poor Poor Lying Thieving Spola.....
You just keep on telling yourself the " House " was crippled.....
Yep...that's the ticket.
Jerry ! Jerry ! JERRY ! .....
The women behind the desk could barely contain their LAUGHTER .......
Yep the Clown Show closed with the Clowns squabbling.
THERE'S YOUR " CRIPPLE "............!!!
Hüsker Dü
DA
You poor thing you. Reality really hurts you don't it.
q.e.d.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Nolte: Impeachment Proves Nancy Pelosi Is an Idiot
For a decade the media have told us Nancy Pelosi is some kind of master strategist. Impeachment proves she's an idiot.
www.breitbart.com
There are some posters here who when shown they are in error respond with insults like "arrogant".
Maybe to keep them from throwing a tantrum and breaking everyone's toys we should just treat them as we would if we were gentle kindergarten teachers.
Hüsker Dü
DA
Their psychological scars are obvious.
Hüsker Dü
DA
You wear your trauma on your sleeve.
Not arrogant at all.
lol.
Would you like a cookie?
HUD should be HUAC?
Welp... I guess if nothing else I think the trial is going to be Schiff's springboard to higher office. Possibly CA Senator, or maybe in the cabinet if a dem takes the WH.
As for the impeachment wrapping up, I'm a bit shocked that there were no witnesses. Just taking into account the relevations Bolton dropped last week. What leverage do you suppose Trump & Co. used to get the moderates fall in line?
As for the impeachment wrapping up, I'm a bit shocked that there were no witnesses. Just taking into account the relevations Bolton dropped last week. What leverage do you suppose Trump & Co. used to get the moderates fall in line?
Yes the House Un-American Activities Committee. Not sure why I wrote HUD.
Hüsker Dü
DA
The outcome came down to, "We don't need witnesses, we know he is guilty, we don't care."
May be the only trial in history where the jury declares guilty as charged, you are free to go.
T
The two previous Presidential impeachment trials to go all the way to a vote (Nixon resigned) resulted in a majority of the Senate voting guilty, but not the 2/3 required by the Constitution. The Democrats and independents are likely to make at least 45 guilty votes, so there is plenty of room for Republicans to effectively vote to split the baby - guilty, but not convicted.
The two previous Presidential impeachment trials to go all the way to a vote (Nixon resigned) resulted in a majority of the Senate voting guilty, but not the 2/3 required by the Constitution. The Democrats and independents are likely to make at least 45 guilty votes, so there is plenty of room for Republicans to effectively vote to split the baby - guilty, but not convicted.
1800, maybe?
The Senate has done what is right many times, but has also done mostly what is expected of them for over 200 years.
Move on.....There's only a .000000000000000001 % chance he'll be convicted
for CRIMES YOU DEMOCRATS COMMITTED !