You are fundamentally correct, not all coaches and clubs practiced what the federation preached. I'm not trying to convince anyone that clubs adhered to anything. There are coaches and clubs that nodded their heads up and down and then did what they wanted to do. But there was a curriculum, there was a style of play that the federation preached (and still do). Some clubs adhered, some didn't. I don't know if you ever sat in on Federation visits or sat through a club visit from US YNT scouts. There was method to the madness. The GDA was focused on the women's team and pushing down the philosophies of how they played. College was a byproduct. It wasn't a bad thing. The downside to the federation was how controlling they were, silly really. Stylistically, I prefer what they preached, but that's my opinion. I love futbol and appreciate how the women's team plays, what Jill Ellis brought to the game and how they executed on the pitch. The men could learn a thing or two from the USWNT. Commit to a style of play, play roles instead of positions...blah blah..all that stuff that was put in place and that the team bought into. As the dad of a soccer addicted girl, it's awesome to watch
The ECNL game is different - it's about college. Nothing wrong with that. No need to pitch style of play, strategy, tactics, etc. ECNL does a great of portraying itself as a platform where our girls develop personally as well athletically, empowerment. Which is great and it works. They place more girls in college than any other platform. And they should, with how much it cost.
And by the way, that quakes team was pretty good, and will be good this year under another name. Plenty of YNT girls on that team. I know there is some resentment towards those young ladies, but that is a really good side.
Enjoy the rest of your fathers day - spend some time on the pitch today being a goalie for your daughter (unless she's a goalie).
Best