No whiplash for you. That would require trying to understand the arguments and numbers behind this.
Your thought goes no further than “I have a bar. Measures against the virus have hurt my bar. Therefore all measures against the virus must be stupid.”.
I am sure you find this to be a nice, consistent worldview. Then you go out on social media, search for things that agree with you, and post them here. That isn’t thought. It’s a simple litmus test filter. Your head is fixed, looking in exactly the same direction, so your neck is quite safe.
Oh I understand the arguments.
I have watched you jump around picking out states you told us would be disasters, then later move on when said predictions didn't come through.
I have watched you argue for testing every team playing in a tournament...without regard to understanding numbers. IE the cost of the testing and the fact that teens/kids have zero risk.
I have watched you be very concerned about schools opening and would cherry pick an article here and there to try to prove a point. Ignoring that around the world millions had gone back to school without issue.
I have watched you argue for killing off biz because you think they shouldn't be open.
And it goes on.
When called on the various above, you conveniently change your argument and move on to the next one.
On of the most recent ones that come to mind is that you argued that (again) restaurants being open is probably the reason for a rise in (I forget which state). When I pointed out lots of other states also opened with no jump and then suddenly you complain you cannot look at one factor (despite the fact that you yourself had just done so).
The policies you have advocated ruin biz, hurt employees, hurt education, etc. And a year out? Turns out you may as well have just been open.
Education. Your preferred solution was online. CA for the longest time had 95% or more kids not in live classes. And yet many other states were fully in person classes without the problems you told us the math said would happen.
And yet you still cling to the idea that gov policy is going to actually control a virus. And you do so without any regard for cost/benefit. On these 2 items you have been remarkably consistent.
