I think you're still woozy from the head injury I inflicted on you, because you forgot your medical study again and are seriously misrepresenting what I've been saying.
The truth is families with a genetic predisposition to knee injuries should consider whether soccer is the best sport for their daughter to play at a high level. Soccer has easily the highest knee injury rate for girls besides lacrosse (the same sport, only for those who weren't good enough at soccer), more than 5x the risk of most other team sports and also significantly higher than basketball. If your child has a genetic predisposition to knee injuries and has an opportunity to succeed in a different sport, they should consider it. I don't care if you don't give a s**t about your own kids' health, but suggesting no one should even consider genetic predispositions to catastrophic knee injuries when deciding whether their kid should commit to soccer 4-6 days a week, 11 months a year is just stupid, especially if you're going to throw her into the GDA (see below).
The truth is the GDA's no reentry rule is dangerous and unnecessary. No legitimate reason exists for this rule, not one, and there is simply no denying that in-game fatigue is the most direct cause of ACL injuries. Despite overwhelming evidence, the GDA clings to rules that significantly increase the risk of catastrophic knee (and all fatigue-related) injuries. Although you said that "ACL is not even mentioned" in the article I posted, you should actually read it when you get over being red in the face from the beat down I inflicted on you earlier and can read clearly. For starters, check out the big graph in the middle of the article titled "ACL Injury Frequency by Minutes Played". Despite being a science denier, you can at least read graphs, right? If not, the short lines on the left are good, and the tall lines on the right are bad.
The truth is that learning the appropriate biomechanics of running can significantly reduce the risk of injury. I'm not sure you're even disputing this, so I'll just move on to the subject that freaks you out, menstruation and the pill. The truth is that the pill almost certainly helps reduce the risk of ACL injuries in girls, and I take it from your failure to provide any medical study to the contrary despite plenty of opportunity and repeated requests, that all you have to say is "nuh-uh". I can only imagine how much time you spent frantically running Google searches without success. Let me speed things along for everyone, because they deserve more persuasive info than your anti-science, juvenile debate tactic: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5524267/; https://ryortho.com/breaking/birth-control-pills-decrease-likelihood-of-knee-injuries/; https://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/..._of_Oral_Contraceptive_Use_on_Anterior.9.aspx. Spoiler alert, these studies were not conducted by a Mt. Olive undergrad student who played DII soccer, not that there's anything wrong with that.
I understand why your daughter is going as far away as possible for college.
The actual number of players who play a full 90 minutes is likely the same as in ECNL.
The actual number of ECNL games in a compressed season to accommodate a High School compressed season is also not very healthy.