Girls Development Academy

You think Slammers G15 minus their top 10 players is worth watching for a college coach?
Have any of you researched what happens to girls that picked a college due to soccer?

Economics majors? Real longitudinal study? I only know from who I know but it's not good, or not worth it.
 
You think Slammers G15 minus their top 10 players is worth watching for a college coach?
Yes, especially for mid-major D1 programs such as UC Davis, UCI, Long Beach St, SDSU, LMU, and alike along with D2-D3 schools. These Universities don't get the Blue Chip recruits. Blue Chippers usually commit to Power 5 conference schools along with Pepperdine and Santa Clara.

You have to be a ulittle parent or still going through the recruiting process, because it seems like you don't know.
 
Last edited:
If wins are your only criteria for success, then you are correct. They win many matches, and it makes me happy when they do. Although the US WNT did not win the 2011 WC, and they were exposed by a smaller, more technical Japanese side. And the gap is closing. Brazil teaches technical futbol, and they always give us a game.



Uh, exact same clubs? Half is not the exact same. Half is half. They picked the best, most accomplished sides from the ECNL, along with the most accomplished non-ECNL clubs that have the talent and ability to teach technical soccer...and LA Premier, a geo-political selection.


Most of the picks were political. The non-ECNL clubs mostly have done nothing. This is a house of cards that is bound to come down. I'm going to enjoy watching this all unfold and I am incredibly thankful that it will be as a non-stakeholder. I guarantee that it's going to be a cluster "F" out of the gates.
 
We are the number one team in the world in women's soccer, yet our U20s lost to Japan 5-0 a month ago. If that's the future for us, we are in trouble. US Soccer is trying to change our future.
The US WNT are the current Olympic and WC Champions. They crushed Japan in the WC finals 5-2, avenging their WC defeat to Japan in PKs. The team is even better now with Mallory Pugh and Crystal Dunn!
 
Last edited:
Yes, especially for mid-major D1 programs such as UC Davis, UCI, Long Beach St, SDSU, LMU, and alike. They don't usually get the elite recruits. Those players commit to Power 5 schools along with Pepperdine and Santa Clara.

You have to be a ulittle parent!

An ECNL team minus many starters is closer in quality to a current EGSL team than not. None of the Universities you mention above recruit from EGSL teams as a norm. This is a clueless post.
 
Last edited:
An ECNL team minus many starters is equal to a current EGSL team, you have to be clueless.
You just confirmed you haven't been through the recruiting process making an idiotic post like that.

I hope your DD is a highly ranked player posting the way you do.
 
Last edited:
hahaha. Keep drinking the Kool-Aid.
Kool-aid? My DD is already committed and graduates this coming May. I am only posting to give back what I learned going through the process with my DD. The new DA league will case ripples than the tidal wave ECNL did when it dethroned National League and CSL Premier as the #1 gaming circuit in the country. Then again you wouldn't know would you.

Where as you are posting garbage that doesn't help ulittle parents navigate through the changing club soccer landscape. You have nothing to offer to the forum!
 
Last edited:
If wins are your only criteria for success, then you are correct. They win many matches, and it makes me happy when they do. Although the US WNT did not win the 2011 WC, and they were exposed by a smaller, more technical Japanese side. And the gap is closing. Brazil teaches technical futbol, and they always give us a game.

Isn't winning what it's about at that level? The USWNT is comprised of professional women athletes. Who cares if the gap is closing? Aren't the results currently being produced? The women are champions without any assistance from the DA. Men are not champions as a result of the DA.

Uh, exact same clubs? Half is not the exact same. Half is half. They picked the best, most accomplished sides from the ECNL, along with the most accomplished non-ECNL clubs that have the talent and ability to teach technical soccer...and LA Premier, a geo-political selection.

Sorry, they picked the clubs who had the money to buy in. I can't wait to hear about how much fees have increased.

Just for the record, I would totally support the DA if they were actually providing something different. Selecting the same clubs, and a few clubs that have been begging for ECNL doesn't count as change.
 
Last edited:
An ECNL team minus many starters is equal to a current EGSL team, you have to be clueless.

Surf U17 without their three national players was far from an EGSL team

slammers GU15 without their national teamer wasn't even close to an EGSL team

My DD GU15 team this past season without their three national teamers was still far from an EGSL team and won a very competitive southwest conference

I am not pro or anti ecnl, every kid needs a certain environment to thrive. Merely showing the statistics
 
Surf U17 without their three national players was far from an EGSL team

slammers GU15 without their national teamer wasn't even close to an EGSL team

My DD GU15 team this past season without their three national teamers was still far from an EGSL team and won a very competitive southwest conference

I am not pro or anti ecnl, every kid needs a certain environment to thrive. Merely showing the statistics
Sombitch, We must both be clueless! :rolleyes:
 
Surf U17 without their three national players was far from an EGSL team

slammers GU15 without their national teamer wasn't even close to an EGSL team

My DD GU15 team this past season without their three national teamers was still far from an EGSL team and won a very competitive southwest conference

I am not pro or anti ecnl, every kid needs a certain environment to thrive. Merely showing the statistics

Appreciate your post. Think of your team minus not one, not three, but minus the 10 best players, that's all I'm pointing out. Maybe not quite an EGSL team but closer to one than not. Just my opinion. And I completely agree with your last statement.

Now for NoGoal posting that mid majors would recruit the remaining talent, it may be true, but mostly from their ID camps if they show well. Their recruiting budget will be mainly for the DA. ECNL will still operate, but minus the best players will not be the same. Smart parents will now shop for the quality of the coaching rather than a patch. There were already many marginal games within ECNL, imagine now without the top talent. There are many great coaches inside the ECNL, as well as outside. Just mho.
 
Last edited:
Kool-aid? My DD is already committed and graduates this coming May. I am only posting to give back what I learned going through the process with my DD. The new DA league will case ripples than the tidal wave ECNL did when it dethroned National League and CSL Premier as the #1 gaming circuit in the country. Then again you wouldn't know would you.

Where as you are posting garbage that doesn't help ulittle parents navigate through the changing club soccer landscape. You have nothing to offer to the forum!
Surf U17 without their three national players was far from an EGSL team

slammers GU15 without their national teamer wasn't even close to an EGSL team

My DD GU15 team this past season without their three national teamers was still far from an EGSL team and won a very competitive southwest conference

I am not pro or anti ecnl, every kid needs a certain environment to thrive. Merely showing the statistics
Thank you for posting and sharing your experiences, always good to see the parents who have gone through it pass along information to help others make the best decision the possibly can for their kids. Keep it coming!
 
According to those "in the know" there will not be any more clubs added in Southern California for the Development Academy. IF this is true, WCFC and RSC will have wait a year and try to get in on expansion next year.
 
Random thoughts and questions about DA and ECNL.
When ECNL was created, was there the same type of (negative and positive) buzz?
Does anyone know the economics for ECNL clubs now versus what it was like before ECNL? Have fees for their non-encl teams increased more than teams that don't have ECNL status? Have they increased their total player population more than non-ecnl clubs?
How many players on an ECNL team receive some sort of financial help from the club?
How will funding for DA clubs work? If US Soccer is giving each team a stipend, is there a requirement that it be allocated for player fees / travel? Does each team get equal funding? Or can a club do whatever it wants with the money? (IE - Give the DOC a raise, hire more coaches, spend money on coach education, buy equipment, build a clubhouse, etc). Do clubs need to provide US Soccer with financials for all teams under their umbrella? (Because it seems that a club could do some funny accounting stuff with this.)
Many clubs have coaches that also coach in high school. How will this be impacted by the no HS for DA players rule?

And unless being a professional female soccer player can become a viable career for more than 30 women in the US, I don't quite understand the need for DA for females.
 
What do you mean how are they going to pay for this? Lol just let me say no one whose kid plays on the B, C, D or E teams should act surprised when they see their club and league fees go up.

[...]

Hopefully nobody is so naive to think US soccer is going to plop down $50k+ per year to each of the 100 or so DA teams to balance the books do you? Where's the money going to come from haha!

Pretty much.

If a club is fielding 3 DA teams, then all they need to do is add 8 uLittle "C", "D", and "E" teams all run by two coaches who are fresh out of college. Those eight ulittle teams can generate an excess of 300K (~15 players per team X $2,500 = $37,500 X 8 = $300K). Pay the two college grad coaches $35k each. Make the parents pay for uniforms and tournaments. Stick the teams on a 20x20 ft. postage stamp space on fields the club is already renting. Then the club still comes out on top of roughly $250K in profit off "elite/academy" bronze ulittle teams. And the DA and ECNL branding will just attract even more ulittle parents ready and willing to pay $2,500 a year to be on the new "F" teams with the hope of climbing the ladder. After all, there are so many success stories of clubs promoting from within.

Pretty good "Non-Profit" racket they got going on.
 
Same coaches, new name. How does this help?

The best athletes and players would be the best regardless of ECNL, GDA, etc.

99% of the so cal girls will never set foot on the pitch for the US NT. Some of these girls on the team play there for a good 10 years!!!! Once the marketing dollars get behind PUGH there will be no one in so cal replacing her for 10-15 years.

Also there no money in professional soccer for the majority who make it. The janitor at your local elementary school makes more and has better benefits.

The goal should be play 2 years in college, then switch your major to something of substance so you can earn over six figures.
 
Now for NoGoal posting that mid majors would recruit the remaining talent, it may be true, but mostly from their ID camps if they show well. Their recruiting budget will be mainly for the DA. ECNL will still operate, but minus the best players will not be the same. Smart parents will now shop for the quality of the coaching rather than a patch. There were already many marginal games within ECNL, imagine now without the top talent. There are many great coaches inside the ECNL, as well as outside. Just mho.
Ummm, from what I heard on the Boys DA side. Boys DA does NOT hold as many college showcase events! So how exactly will that eat into a mid-majors coaches budget? Also do you think mid-majors conference coaches like a Wyoming or Boise St. will be focusing all their time, effort and budget trying to recruit Blue Chippers on a DA team?

I never posted ECNL wouldn't be the same, of course DA will take some bite out of ECNL, but until DA fields teams in every age group vs 2 year combined age groups. ECNL will still be a viable option for the next level of players below....and why Blues, Slammers, Surf, and Eagles in SoCal will have a inherit advantage over the other clubs only offering DA or ECNL.
 
Back
Top