Lightning Red
GOLD
For what its worth they have already begun to rank the U10's (2007's) locally, regionally, and nationally.
http://youthsoccerrankings.us/
http://youthsoccerrankings.us/
For what its worth they have already begun to rank the U10's (2007's) locally, regionally, and nationally.
http://youthsoccerrankings.us/
And apparently "Solar" losing at Surf Cup 9-3 didn't hurt them in getting the top spot nationally. Any of the top 10 So Cal teams would beat them handily.
I was well aware of that when I posted. Those games were in August on postage stamp fields. I did see Solar play in that tourney and on regular 8v8 fields I don't think they could hang. IMO. Same case could be made for the 9-3 scoreline at the hands of Eagles who did win that tourney.Uhhh... they beat #2, #6 and tied 7. Right? Certainly took a beating from #4.
And to your point top 10 is a bit bold. I'll stick with top 5.I was well aware of that when I posted. Those games were in August on postage stamp fields. I did see Solar play in that tourney and on regular 8v8 fields I don't think they could hang. IMO. Same case could be made for the 9-3 scoreline at the hands of Eagles who did win that tourney.
Very happy that they changed having anybody play on those tiny things.
Very happy that they changed having anybody play on those tiny things.
Surf Cup was the minimum field size allowed. 30x50 seems about right. I would expect Vegas to be played on your standard 9v9 fields.So Surf Cup was what 30x50? What is the new size? More of a 40x60? 50x80 would seem to big. What is Vegas playing if you know?
Surf Cup was the minimum field size allowed. 30x50 seems about right. I would expect Vegas to be played on your standard 9v9 fields.
Also depends if Vegas starts using the build out line. Saw it used in TOC in December. It is the one change that will speed the development of players the fastest until the "winning" coaches decide to put the big foot on the backline. The coaches that don't will develop the better players over time.