The strict constructionist is lying about the law again. NYC requires only that anti-vaxxers must wear masks, except when riding public transportation, in a school or healthcare setting, in group residential facilities, when in a store, restaurant or other public space when the owner requires it, or at work also if required by the employer. Here, all attendees at the Gala were required to be vaccinated and therefore not required to wear masks. In fact, even vaccinated employees were not required by any ordinance to wear a mask, and to the extent they were required to wear one, it was because it was required by their employer. Accordingly, there is no hypocrisy. To the extent the strict constructionist insinuates that the government is responsible for "hypocrisy" because it required employees to wear masks, she is lying again. One would think Grace T. would support an employer's ability to decide how to operate its business, which was exactly what was happening here. But the truth is, she is opposed to anyone who supports vaccines or masks, whether it's the federal government, a state government, a local jurisdiction, and now apparently private employers. Also, when Grace T. claims that guests at the Gala fundraiser were "performing", is that consistent with a "strict constructionist" theory? Do local ordinances that apply to employees now include guests at fundraisers because, you know, employee = guest in the dictionary?
Probably the most annoying thing about Grace T.'s opinions are that she apparently has not been employed during her adult life and therefore has no idea how anything actually works in business. While Grace T. prances around her keyboard making up nonsense about constitutional law showdowns and encouraging people to engage in behavior that jacks up everyone's healthcare costs, the truth is employers are requiring that employees wear masks because they don't want them getting sick and dying, because it's expensive. Schools and businesses are requiring masks for employees in large part due to the exorbitant increased healthcare and workers' comp. costs associated with the pandemic, which have increased in double digits for many employers and employees. While Grace T. claims it is all "hypocrisy" and falsely asserts that the city had something to do with why employees were wearing masks, that was just a lie. The truth is that businesses - including the city as it pertains to schools - are requiring masks because they are trying to keep healthcare costs down and can't do that if/when their anti-vaxxer employees or their dependents spend weeks in the ICU, so they make their employees wear masks and, in many cases now, get vaccinated. Or like at Delta Airlines, the anti-vaxxers get to pay more for their stupidity.
As for Grace T.'s attempt to equate Obama's birthday to Sturgis, that is more misleading b.s. Obama's party followed all CDC protocols, guests were instructed to be vaccinated and required presentation of a negative test prior to entry. Did Sturgis follow any protocols? Was a negative test required for entry? Were participants asked to be vaccinated? Essentially what Grace T. is claiming is that no liberals should be able to do anything regardless of how careful they are unless and until the confederate flag waving anti-vaxxer crowd gets to do whatever they want, regardless of how stupid they are. And even when they are allowed to do whatever they want, such as at Sturgis, liberals still shouldn't be allowed to do anything regardless of the precautions they take because it just isn't fair that anyone criticize them for being stupid.