The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

[Hüsker Dü]

Report: Democrats Say ‘Whistleblower’s’ Testimony No Longer Needed

Getty Images
JOSHUA CAPLAN24 Oct 20191,674
2:50
House Democrats believe there is sufficient evidence to advance their closed-door impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump without seeking testimony from the so-called “whistleblower,” whose complaint initially prompted the probe, according to a Thursday evening report.

The Washington Post, citing several House Democrats, reports that the so-called “whistleblower’s” testimony is no longer a priority in the wake of testimonies delivered by Ukraine’s top diplomat, William Taylor, and former National Security Council senior director Fiona Hill, before congressional investigators.

As you might say that is obvi. All the players the whistleblower would have spoke of have already come out to defend America against t.

 

[espola]

As you might say that is obvi. All the players the whistleblower would have spoke of have already come out to defend America against t.

Once the door is open, there is no more need for the keymaster.

 

[messy]

Maybe the saddest thing about this entire Trump affair(s) is that those of us here who are patriots are forced to side with John Bolton. LOL.

 

[Hüsker Dü]

Maybe the saddest thing about this entire Trump affair(s) is that those of us here who are patriots are forced to side with John Bolton. LOL.

People like Jeff Sessions, Rex Tillerson and Bolton somehow come off looking like patriots while others are digging their political and professional graves. see: Sarah Sanders, Sean Spicer and whatever happened to Ted Nugent, Kid Rock (what is he like in his 40's now? Kid?), Sarah Palin, Sheriff Joe, etc. etc.?

 

[espola]

The self-mockery continues -- "I am the team".

 

[Sheriff Joe]

Maybe the saddest thing about this entire Trump affair(s) is that those of us here who are patriots are forced to side with John Bolton. LOL.

You libs think that you are the definition of patriots?

 

[Bruddah IZ]

It takes a real liar to conflate “tanks and armored vehicles” in oil fields with boats floating in the Med and the Gulf.

Does it now? Please go on General Accipitridae.

 

[messy]

You libs think that you are the definition of patriots?

Not the definition...but we find ourselves on the same side as Bolton and so many other conservatives, because it’s about country over Trump.
We can talk about it when you pay off our water.

 

[Bruddah IZ]

Not the definition...but we find ourselves on the same side as Bolton and so many other conservatives, because it’s about country over Trump.
We can talk about it when you pay off our water.

Your premise is slighted.

 

[Bruddah IZ]

Report: Democrats Say ‘Whistleblower’s’ Testimony No Longer Needed

Getty Images
JOSHUA CAPLAN24 Oct 20191,674
2:50
House Democrats believe there is sufficient evidence to advance their closed-door impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump without seeking testimony from the so-called “whistleblower,” whose complaint initially prompted the probe, according to a Thursday evening report.

The Washington Post, citing several House Democrats, reports that the so-called “whistleblower’s” testimony is no longer a priority in the wake of testimonies delivered by Ukraine’s top diplomat, William Taylor, and former National Security Council senior director Fiona Hill, before congressional investigators.

Not even in writing? This is too funny.

 

[Nonononono]

Not even in writing? This is too funny.

I thought you people were all up in arms over the whistleblower having secondhand information?

With Bill Taylor, your concerns are now alleviated. First hand witnesses should make you satisfied. Now you people are satisfied, amirite or amirite?

 

[Sheriff Joe]

As you might say that is obvi. All the players the whistleblower would have spoke of have already come out to defend America against t.

I have a tear in my eye now knowing you look up to and are trying to be just like me.

 

[Bruddah IZ]

I thought you people were all up in arms over the whistleblower having secondhand information?

With Bill Taylor, your concerns are now alleviated. First hand witnesses should make you satisfied. Now you people are satisfied, amirite or amirite?

Concerned? Lol!!

 

[messy]

I thought you people were all up in arms over the whistleblower having secondhand information?

With Bill Taylor, your concerns are now alleviated. First hand witnesses should make you satisfied. Now you people are satisfied, amirite or amirite?

He’s amused. That’s good. Laughter is fun.

 

[Hüsker Dü]

How dare Pompeo bring an honest and honorable man into this administration! . . . "everyone makes mistakes".

 

[Hüsker Dü]

On Thursday, Graham announced that he’d put forward a resolution condemning the House impeachment inquiry. By mid-afternoon, when he actually announced it, the resolution had been watered down to a plea for a different and more transparent process, apparently a sop to GOP senators unwilling to go quite that far. And yet by Friday morning, only 44 of 53 Republicans in the Senate had signed on to the resolution. A gesture meant to be a show of solidarity by senators has instead become a sign of the weakness of the president’s position.

 

[messy]

On Thursday, Graham announced that he’d put forward a resolution condemning the House impeachment inquiry. By mid-afternoon, when he actually announced it, the resolution had been watered down to a plea for a different and more transparent process, apparently a sop to GOP senators unwilling to go quite that far. And yet by Friday morning, only 44 of 53 Republicans in the Senate had signed on to the resolution. A gesture meant to be a show of solidarity by senators has instead become a sign of the weakness of the president’s position.

And a court ruled against them today on process also. It's legal.
With that phony Sheriff Joe beef out of the way, we get to whether they have the facts and the behavior to support an impeachment process. Seems pretty obvious they do, even to many, many republicans.
The Trump worshippers (how weird are they?) are bummed!

 

[Hüsker Dü]

And a court ruled against them today on process also. It's legal.
With that phony Sheriff Joe beef out of the way, we get to whether they have the facts and the behavior to support an impeachment process. Seems pretty obvious they do, even to many, many republicans.
The Trump worshippers (how weird are they?) are bummed!

Blind allegiance despite all the, not only mounting evidence, but the fact that t has gone against many of their previously hard held tenets is particularly unusual. I keep thinking what a joke t was to everyone until he went full fledged birther, and that drew out a particular segment of Americans. Now t is once again a national embarrassment yet now he is dragging the whole country down with him . . . and these fools show they love him more than America. Fear and loathing, once they saw the image of the Obama's entering the White House it twisted their psyche. They'd rather burn it down than live in an America that is inclusive.

 

[Sheriff Joe]

Blind allegiance despite all the, not only mounting evidence, but the fact that t has gone against many of their previously hard held tenets is particularly unusual. I keep thinking what a joke t was to everyone until he went full fledged birther, and that drew out a particular segment of Americans. Now t is once again a national embarrassment yet now he is dragging the whole country down with him . . . and these fools show they love him more than America. Fear and loathing, once they saw the image of the Obama's entering the White House it twisted their psyche. They'd rather burn it down than live in an America that is inclusive.

We can tell you are a happy guy, your babble increases, still makes no sense though.

 

[Sheriff Joe]

This reminds me when trump said he and his campaign were being spied on.
I wonder if trump readily knows after all he was right the first time, but I am sure Barr wouldn’t tell trump anything about his criminal investigation.