The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

Grills CEO Jack Dorsey

JackHeader.png

Getty Images
ALLUM BOKHARI 3 Sep 2018


Twitter has said that its overzealous downranking of accounts was the result of errors in their system, just three days before CEO Jack Dorsey is set to testify before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on the subject of social media censorship.



The company said that in its previous system, accounts determined to have a “higher likelihood of being viewed as abusive” were downranked in public conversations — up until now.

Notably, the platform’s previous system didn’t merely seek to downrank accounts that were actually abusive, but accounts that could be viewed as abusive. And not even that — accounts that were likely to be viewed as abusive.

Twitter did not explain whose determinations of “abusiveness” were being treated as authoritative.


Twitter said that they turned off the feature, explaining that a “higher level of precision” is needed. The acknowledgment that its system of downranking was flawed comes just a few days before Jack Dorsey is set to answer lawmakers’ questions on the subject of social media censorship. The evidence session is the result of recent controversy over Twitter’s blocking and “shadowbanning” practices, which has affected top Republican politicians but not Democrats.


The company said that it would continue to factor “behavioral signals” into how the platform ranks tweets, in order to serve “conversational health.” What these signals include remains a mystery.


Twitter has thus far refused to acknowledge that its downranking algorithms implicitly favor the left. Because Twitter factors in the number of times an account has been blocked or muted when deciding whether to downrank its content, it has set up a system that favors the easily-offended: people who like to shut themselves off from contrary opinions. It isn’t merely a stereotype that these people tend to be found more frequently on the left — research has found that Democrats are three times more likely than Republicans block or unfriend people over their political opinions on social media.
When the shadow banning first came to light, @jack had everyone on the conservative side of the aisle blocked.
Seriously, he had blocked every account with a conservative viewpoint.
I had never even heard of him when this happened, and when I checked, sure enough, I was blocked.
After that he unblocked most of us, including myself, but the cat was out of the bag.
The blocking and reporting by armies of leftist trolls played a big part in censoring conservative views on twitter.
There are other tactics, most of which were lifted a few days ago.
Its very noticeable to those paying attention.

The timing of twitter lifting most of their shadow ban tactics right before testifying is hilarious.
 
Leave my wife out of it, leave my family out of it, It’s me they’re after anyway. They’re not after my wife; they want to take me down, that’s what they’re up to. So let’s get this in the arena and have this settled.
"News Flash"
Nobody cares about you either.

I mean that in the easiest way to handle ever.
Please relay this message to espola as well.
 

EducatédHillbilly™@RobProvince


Nike embracing a guy who thinks cops are pigs and love a Communist mass murderer is a very interesting marketing campaign for an athletic sportswear company. #JustDoIt

3:02 PM - Sep 3, 2018
Collins’ tweet, depicting former NFL player and Army Ranger Pat Tillman who was killed during combat operations in Afghanistan in 2004, was widely used by people on social media to show what an athlete making a real sacrifice looks like.

Others pointed out Nike’s hypocrisy in supporting Kaepernick’s protests while selling shoes allegedly produced in factories that may have questionable labor practices:
 
Im conflicted here because I am uneducated. (formally)
This does not mean I agree with Sotomayor. In fact, I think she's a polished product of the system she represents.

Don't sell yourself short. You are well-educated in the sense that you remember what you have been told to believe.
 
When the shadow banning first came to light, @jack had everyone on the conservative side of the aisle blocked.
Seriously, he had blocked every account with a conservative viewpoint.
I had never even heard of him when this happened, and when I checked, sure enough, I was blocked.
After that he unblocked most of us, including myself, but the cat was out of the bag.
The blocking and reporting by armies of leftist trolls played a big part in censoring conservative views on twitter.
There are other tactics, most of which were lifted a few days ago.
Its very noticeable to those paying attention.

The timing of twitter lifting most of their shadow ban tactics right before testifying is hilarious.

Since twitter never had any "shadow ban tactics", what was the timing?
 

Kavanaugh and the Ginsburg Standard
‘No hints, no forecasts, no previews,’ she said in 1993, responding to a question about discrimination.



53 Comments
By
David B. Rivkin Jr. and
Andrew M. Grossman
Sept. 3, 2018 5:35 p.m. ET
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is sworn in at her 1993 confirmation hearing. PHOTO: JEFFREY MARKOWITZ/SYGMA VIA GETTY IMAGES

Don’t blame Brett Kavanaugh when he demurs at his confirmation hearing from answering questions on legal issues that might come before the Supreme Court. It’s the senators who will be in the wrong, for demanding commitments that no judicious nominee could provide. To answer “direct questions on stare decisis on many other matters, including Roe and health care”—as Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has called for—would itself be disqualifying.

That principle has come to be called the Ginsburg Standard, after Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. As she explained in the opening statement of her 1993 confirmation hearing: “A judge sworn to decide impartially can offer no forecasts, no hints, for that would show not only disregard for the specifics of the particular case—it would display disdain for the entire judicial process.” Or, as she later responded to a question about constitutional protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation: “No hints, no forecasts, no previews.”
 
Back
Top