2020...

How many of Trump’s close associates are in jail?
And also, you need to let black people know that Dems are racist. Oh wait, you mean racist against whites? LOL.
So you think the party of FDR, KKK and Virginia aren't racist? How about the towelheads leading your party in congress right now?
 
Exhibit A Towel Head #1.

rashida-tlaib-channel-4-SCREENSHOT-363x193.jpg

Rep. Rashida Tlaib Accuses Fellow Democrats of Islamophobia
Bonchie
 
Bottom line. Dems are socialist, racist, hate creating, dividing, lying, law breaking, morally bankrupt, baby killers.

Race relations were set back 40 years thanks to Obama. Now Dems are trying to talk about reparations just to pander the black vote because they are starting to flip. Funny thing is anyone with any intelligence what-so-ever knows that would be impossible. 100% impossible. Why impossible? Hmmmm, let's trace roots back 160 years, when there was not much paperwork, then try to find all living relatives while sifting through scammers, immigrants, inter-racial marriages, 2nd/3rd/4th marriages, adoptions, etc. IMPOSSIBLE. Just straight lying for a vote.

Enjoy this video of what life used to be like...

Enjoy life now...

Coocoo.
 
This otta help,

Minority students offered no-whites ‘safe space’ racial healing circle
Drew Van Voorhis - San Diego State University •March 12, 2019
Share this article: The College Fix on Facebook The College Fix on Twitter The College Fix on Youtube Share on Email
circlehug.shutterstock-370x242.jpg

San Diego State University is set to host a “Racial Healing Workshop” for minority students and faculty later this month that aims to help students and professors of color get through college and career life.

“This intimate one and a half hour Racial Healing Workshop catered to students and faculty of color will be led by well-known professional Dr. Cheryl E. Matias,” state the student organizers of the event, the Marriage and Family Therapy Association, a recognized student organization under the College of Education.

“She will provide a safe space for students and faculty of color to discuss issues that impact persons of color in higher academia,” the event’s online description states. “Dr. Matias will facilitate group healing and she will provide tools to help POC [people of color] navigate racialized spaces such as higher education and professional fields.”
 
How many of Trump’s close associates are in jail?
And also, you need to let black people know that Dems are racist. Oh wait, you mean racist against whites? LOL.


  • Operation chaos: Club for Growth airs attack ad targeting Beto O’Rourke for “white male privilege”


Operation chaos: Club for Growth airs attack ad targeting Beto O’Rourke for “white male privilege”
AllahpunditPosted at 5:31 pm on March 11, 2019


b-3.jpg

How many political ads make you literally laugh aloud? This one may be the first for me, or at least the first since the legendary Dale Peterson ad. The line about Barack Obama breaking barriers and Beto crashing into them, uttered without missing a beat?



They got me.



That’s one point of distinction here. The other is the sheer effort that went into this right-wing attempt to destroy O’Rourke from the left in the Democratic Party. It’s not a 30-second hit-and-run or a bit of tongue-in-cheek trollishness. This is a two-minute-long indictment that leaves no trace in its substance that it comes from a well-known conservative outfit, particularly in its very calculated praise for … Barack Obama. (CFG does disclose at the end that it produced the ad but it’s required by law to do so.) It doesn’t focus on Beto’s spending policies either, which at least would be in the wheelhouse of an organization that focuses on fiscal policy. It’s an identity-politics critique of his authenticity, aimed at Iowa progressives who don’t yet know much about O’Rourke but have heard the buzz and might be susceptible to love at first sight. CFG isn’t playing games here in meddling in the other party’s primary. This really is designed, I think, to try to inoculate left-wing voters from Betomania before they contract the disease.

Why target Beto? For one specific reason and one more general one. The general one is that there’s no obvious Republican argument against him if he’s the nominee. Bernie and Warren will be tagged as socialists if they’re nominated and a Trump/Harris or Trump/Booker election will sink into identitarian ugliness on both sides but what would the main line of attack on Beto be? He tried to leave the scene of a DUI 25 years ago? He has little government experience — compared to a president who had none when he was elected? CFG is trying to take him out now because they know it’d be more difficult to take him out next fall.

As for the specific reason, in a word: Texas.

“We watched what he did in Texas in the race against Cruz and realized his potential within the Democratic primary system is enormously larger than what people are giving him credit for right now. We realized, here is a real potential threat because if he is the nominee then Texas suddenly is in play,” McIntosh said…

Texas Sen. John Cornyn, a Republican who is up for reelection next year, is among those preparing for a fight. In recent weeks, Cornyn aides have been working with the RNC to set up an ambitious field program in the state.

“If Beto is the nominee, I think the temptation will be too great for the Democrats not to spend significant resources in Texas,” said Rob Jesmer, a senior Cornyn adviser. “And we need to match their efforts. If we do, we’ll win, and if we don’t, it will be perilous for everyone up and down the ballot.”

It’s especially clever to compare him unfavorably to Obama. Attacking him for being a fake progressive carries risk, after all, by accidentally giving moderate Democrats a reason to take a closer look at him. Not every primary voter is a Berniebro or socialist-curious; by making the case that O’Rourke *isn’t* a radical you’re putting him on the radar of the great mass of Dems eager to find someone who can stop Sanders. Depicting him as a fake Obama will alienate even some centrists from him, though. Remember, in 2019 Democrats are more apt to define themselves politically by the “Obama” brand than they are by any ideological label.

Anyway, helping the other party’s “unelectable” candidates get nominated because they supposedly can’t win a general election can’t possibly backfire. Good luck, CFG!
 
Paul Manafort, charged with nothing to do with Russian Collusion. Facts. Dates back to 2006 to 2014. Long before Trump.

"What are the charges?
The 32-count indictment charged Mr. Manafort with disguising more than $30 million in overseas income by moving it through offshore accounts, lying to banks and evading taxes.

Prosecutors claim that beginning in 2006, Mr. Manafort hid millions of dollars in income that he received from the Ukrainian government and Ukrainian oligarchs to promote a pro-Russian leader, Viktor Yanukovych. When Mr. Yanukovych fled to Russia after a popular uprising in 2014, prosecutors say, the spigot of funds from Ukraine dried up. They charge that Mr. Manafort then resorted to bank fraud to maintain his lifestyle."
 
Paul Manafort, charged with nothing to do with Russian Collusion. Facts. Dates back to 2006 to 2014. Long before Trump.

"What are the charges?
The 32-count indictment charged Mr. Manafort with disguising more than $30 million in overseas income by moving it through offshore accounts, lying to banks and evading taxes.

Prosecutors claim that beginning in 2006, Mr. Manafort hid millions of dollars in income that he received from the Ukrainian government and Ukrainian oligarchs to promote a pro-Russian leader, Viktor Yanukovych. When Mr. Yanukovych fled to Russia after a popular uprising in 2014, prosecutors say, the spigot of funds from Ukraine dried up. They charge that Mr. Manafort then resorted to bank fraud to maintain his lifestyle."

"...he received from the Ukrainian government and Ukrainian oligarchs to promote a pro-Russian leader..."
 
George Papadopoulos, business as usual. If below is true, then why has no one from the FAKE Dossier been charged yet? Double standard.

George Papadopoulos, 31, pleaded guilty in October to lying to the FBI about key details of his conversations with a London-based professor who had told him the Russians held “dirt,” in the form of thousands of emails, on Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
 
How many of Trump’s close associates are in jail?
And also, you need to let black people know that Dems are racist. Oh wait, you mean racist against whites? LOL.

Obviously pretty much all of Joe's responses to this post are trash. That said, I am curious on your take on racism? Like if I heard, through the paper thin wall of my office, a mixed group of white / asian homosexual / straight women talking about how they don't like working with white straight men... would you consider that racist/sexist? Or what if it was a group of black women... does that make it okay?

I only ask because I've always said I'm against racism period. But it seems like that's not really politically in vogue anymore as your post seems to allude to... or is talk of not agreeing with any type of racism at all just me speaking from a position of privilege?
 
Roger Stone, again, BS charges
Please continue. You're doing great. No one is laughing at you.

"In 2012 and 2013, according to the indictment, Manafort used offshore accounts to wire more than 2 million euros to pay the former politicians.

“The group was managed by a former European Chancellor, Foreign Politician A, in coordination with Manafort,” the indictment charges.

The charges against Manafort and Gates do not involve activities inside the Trump campaign, although the conduct in question continued while they worked there. Instead, the special counsel accused the men of lying on their income-tax returns and conspiring to commit bank fraud to get loans as part of an elaborate scheme to use their income from the Ukrainian political party to buy properties, evade taxes and support Manafort’s lavish lifestyle.

Prosecutors charge that Manafort, with help from Gates, laundered more than $30 million between 2006 and 2016, and Gates transferred more than $3 million to accounts he controlled during that time."
 
Nope, I'm done. Debating Dems is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon does not follow the rules/facts, walks around, knocks all the pieces over, shits all over the board, and then claims victory.

That's the problem with this world today. Your feelings are more important than actual facts.
 
Nope, I'm done. Debating Dems is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon does not follow the rules/facts, walks around, knocks all the pieces over, shits all over the board, and then claims victory.

That's the problem with this world today. Your feelings are more important than actual facts.

Loser.
 
Nope, I'm done. Debating Dems is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon does not follow the rules/facts, walks around, knocks all the pieces over, shits all over the board, and then claims victory.

That's the problem with this world today. Your feelings are more important than actual facts.

loser
 
Obviously pretty much all of Joe's responses to this post are trash. That said, I am curious on your take on racism? Like if I heard, through the paper thin wall of my office, a mixed group of white / asian homosexual / straight women talking about how they don't like working with white straight men... would you consider that racist/sexist? Or what if it was a group of black women... does that make it okay?

I only ask because I've always said I'm against racism period. But it seems like that's not really politically in vogue anymore as your post seems to allude to... or is talk of not agreeing with any type of racism at all just me speaking from a position of privilege?
Urinidiot
 
It is true though... can't really think of any coverage on Schultz that has been positive. Only negative hit pieces...


Howard Schultz laments 'character assassination' as he mulls 2020 White House run
https://thehill.com/homenews/campai...er-assassination-as-he-mulls-2020-white-house

Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz reportedly said Monday he "never thought" he would get so much criticism for his potential 2020 White House bid.

During a book event in Alabama, Schultz expressed surprise at what he called "character assassination" he says he's faced from Democrats since expressing interest in a third-party run, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

“I’ve never thought I’d be criticized as much. I didn’t think this would be a character assassination [from Democrats]," Schultz said. "I think the concerns the American people have are greater than the threat to the two-party system.”

Schultz went on to tell CNN's Van Jones, as he has said before, that he does not intend to "jeopardize" the chances of removing President Trump from the Oval Office.

“I don’t think that answer can be answered in March of 2019. We’re 18 months away and a lot could happen,” he reportedly added. “I won’t do anything to jeopardize the critical importance of removing this president from the Oval Office.”

Schultz's comments come as he has faced weeks of criticism from prominent 2020 Democrats including Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) for hinting at a third-party bid. They have accused him of using his substantial wealth to "buy" political influence and raise clout around his announcement, fearing he could split the liberal vote.
 
Back
Top