Trump Lost

Kicker4Life said:
Isn’t there already an ongoing investigation?
Click to expand...
I'm not necessarily opposed to a bi-partisan investigation (if that's even possible), but I do find it odd that we're having the investigation after the trial. Typically it works the other way around, but hey its DC.
 
Desert Hound said:
That doesn't count. They need a "politicized investigation" to fire up the sheep.
Click to expand...
You know that's not the case. As constructed this would have been as bi-partisan as you get in the US, as agreed in the House and why 35 GOPers voted for it there. A direct attack on the seat of our democracy as it undertook one of the most fundamental constitutional tasks which resulted in multiple deaths and you think some criminal investigations should sort that out, really?

What will now happen is that the Dems will create a House committee like the GOP Benghazi constructed joke that was purely for partisan gain. That's not helpful and a waste of time & money.
 
whatithink said:
You know that's not the case. As constructed this would have been as bi-partisan as you get in the US, as agreed in the House and why 35 GOPers voted for it there. A direct attack on the seat of our democracy as it undertook one of the most fundamental constitutional tasks which resulted in multiple deaths and you think some criminal investigations should sort that out, really?

What will now happen is that the Dems will create a House committee like the GOP Benghazi constructed joke that was purely for partisan gain. That's not helpful and a waste of time & money.
Click to expand...

If that proposed House investigative committee finds some real meat, that may or may not help with the DOJ proceedings, depending on whether they follow evidence rules properly and don't give key witnesses golden tickets as they did with Ollie North.

One advantage a House committee will have over the DOJ is that they won't need to get a judge to sign off on subpoenas.
 
espola said:
If that proposed House investigative committee finds some real meat, that may or may not help with the DOJ proceedings, depending on whether they follow evidence rules properly and don't give key witnesses golden tickets as they did with Ollie North.

One advantage a House committee will have over the DOJ is that they won't need to get a judge to sign off on subpoenas.
Click to expand...
Meh! Small advantage not even worth mentioning.
 
“The reason he was there is because he was a dumbass and believed what he heard on Fox News.”
—Joseph Hurley, a lawyer representing an alleged Capitol rioter, Anthony Antonio, tells Associated Press he is one of many attorneys using misinformation as a defense.​
 
espola said:
“The reason he was there is because he was a dumbass and believed what he heard on Fox News.”
—Joseph Hurley, a lawyer representing an alleged Capitol rioter, Anthony Antonio, tells Associated Press he is one of many attorneys using misinformation as a defense.​
Click to expand...
Then of course only a trumpy-ass faux news viewer would/could simultaneously say that’s a great defense and then turn faux on and say “HELL YEAH!!! They got the inside scoop!”
 
Stanford Chapter of Federalist Society supports free speech as long as they are not the target of the joke, so they tried to cancel the author of this from receiving his law degree --

1622717715030.png
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Then of course only a trumpy-ass faux news viewer would/could simultaneously say that’s a great defense and then turn faux on and say “HELL YEAH!!! They got the inside scoop!”
Click to expand...

Or use what is now known as the "Fox Defense" -- "no reasonable person would believe me".
 
espola said:
T supporter of the day --

abc7ny.com

Pro-Trump, anti-Biden signs with foul language cause stir in NJ town

The issue is not the homeowner's strong support for Donald Trump, rather it is her signs in her yard -- full of profane language.
abc7ny.com abc7ny.com
Click to expand...

I stand corrected --

www.rawstory.com

70-year-old ‘Trump man’ admits to politically motivated serial pooping spree: police

An Ohio supporter of Donald Trump told police that he defecated in a neighbor's yard "multiple times" because they are Democrats."A 70-year-old Ohio man who told cops he was a "Trump man" confessed to repeatedly urinating and defecating in front of a neighbor's home because the residents "are...
www.rawstory.com www.rawstory.com
 
espola said:
T supporter of the day --

abc7ny.com

Pro-Trump, anti-Biden signs with foul language cause stir in NJ town

The issue is not the homeowner's strong support for Donald Trump, rather it is her signs in her yard -- full of profane language.
abc7ny.com abc7ny.com
Click to expand...
In Arizona I have seen trump flags that the f- word clearly and prominently featured on the flag. Professionally done, but most are one sided (lol! Cheap suckers). Do these people care about children or do they want to encourage a foul mouth and rude society? Fucking hypocrites.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
In Arizona I have seen trump flags that the f- word clearly and prominently featured on the flag. Professionally done, but most are one sided (lol! Cheap suckers). Do these people care about children or do they want to encourage a foul mouth and rude society? Fucking hypocrites.
Click to expand...
Don't even have to go to AZ. There is a stand right before you get to Galway Downs that has a "Fuc Biden" flag. I assume that is just for display purposes and the actual ones being sold have the full spelling. While I'm not a fan of the flags, keeping kids out of school is far more harmful than kids being exposed to the F word. For someone who thinks its funny to call a woman the C word, I'm not sure the moral high ground is the most credible position for you to argue from.
 
watfly said:
Don't even have to go to AZ. There is a stand right before you get to Galway Downs that has a "Fuc Biden" flag. I assume that is just for display purposes and the actual ones being sold have the full spelling. While I'm not a fan of the flags, keeping kids out of school is far more harmful than kids being exposed to the F word. For someone who thinks its funny to call a woman the C word, I'm not sure the moral high ground is the most credible position for you to argue from.
Click to expand...
Still making things up in an attempt to elevate your position I see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top