OMG

"Right, so their mass availability, which can create a situation like Chicago, is ok with you. Got it."


Murder rates in Chicago vary greatly depending on the neighborhood in question. Many neighborhoods on the South Side are impoverished, lack educational resources, predominantly African American, and infested with street gangs.[24] The neighborhoods of Englewood on the South Side, and Austin on the West side, for example, have homicide rates that are ten times higher than other parts of the city.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_Chicago
 
I didn't imply a conclusion... I presented facts you didn't want to know... which is why you didn't debate me or present me with facts that show an alternative conclusion. The fact is, African Americans kill each other at TEN TIMES the rate a white man or cop will kill them. Try giving me that "relative to population" thing again, please. Maybe something about proximity... slavery... Emmett Till. Poverty is one of my favorite excuses. Because, despite the fact that other races live in poverty, too, well... you get the idea.
I'm not contesting your facts. I'm just prodding you to present them instead of encouraging others to jump to your conclusion without them.
 
Obama ran in 2016? I missed that. I might have voted for him that year.
Sounds like you learned nothing from the last election....good luck with that.
2018?
No 2016
Obama lost congress but won reelection...remember?


When I referred to the last election I was talking about the last PRESIDENTIAL election
You asked 2018 - referring to the congressional election.
I responded No 2016 - thinking you would understand 2016 was the election I was referencing originally
I pointed out much as Trump lost congress in 2018, Obama also lost the House in the 2010 election, but won reelection.
The mid term elections don't necessarily mean anything. If the Democrats nominate another flawed candidate, unfortunately ,Trump will repeat.
I think even Daffy will understand now.
 
I'm not contesting your facts. I'm just prodding you to present them instead of encouraging others to jump to your conclusion without them.
Suggest you do the research and jump to your own conclusions.
Wait...you've already jumped to your conclusions.
 
I'm not contesting your facts. I'm just prodding you to present them instead of encouraging others to jump to your conclusion without them.
I presented facts... unless you think the FBI and Washington Post are full of shit... like Kavanaugh accusers.
 
Sounds like you learned nothing from the last election....good luck with that.
2018?
No 2016
Obama lost congress but won reelection...remember?


When I referred to the last election I was talking about the last PRESIDENTIAL election
You asked 2018 - referring to the congressional election.
I responded No 2016 - thinking you would understand 2016 was the election I was referencing originally
I pointed out much as Trump lost congress in 2018, Obama also lost the House in the 2010 election, but won reelection.
The mid term elections don't necessarily mean anything. If the Democrats nominate another flawed candidate, unfortunately ,Trump will repeat.
I think even Daffy will understand now.
I'm still not clear on how Obama lost in 2016.
 
I presented facts... unless you think the FBI and Washington Post are full of shit... like Kavanaugh accusers.
You keep bringing up terms like "FBI" and "Washington Post" as if we had read the same articles you have. An actual quote and/or a link might be more fruitful.
 
I know that you're thankful for all the gun availability. Congrats!
Avoidance.... it's what you and Espola do when you know you're wrong or can't answer because you'll look bad. We all see it, it's what you two do best and it's what makes you two laughable...
 
You keep bringing up terms like "FBI" and "Washington Post" as if we had read the same articles you have. An actual quote and/or a link might be more fruitful.
I gave you the link. Post #2995. Perhaps you missed it... I didn't include "wikipedia" in the post.
 
You said there was data in FBI reports. You provided a link to new article behind a paywall.

I'm still watching.
It's not a pay wall. You're allowed to click so many times, then you have to refresh your browser and go back, which is why I put the statistics down for you. Again, I can't do the thing in crayon.
 
Top