An amazing case for reducing gun ownership in America

The most advanced personal firearm in general use at the time of the adoption of the 2nd Amendment was the Kentucky rifle - muzzle loaded, flintlock action, available in a variety of calibers up to .62, capable of 2 rounds per minute by a skilled user, effective range about 100-200 yards.
Yawn
 
821-gunfree.jpg
 
Less guns, fewer deaths. Not much more to it than that! Revolution, blah blah blah.
What kind of lawyer are you?
Being a JD and a practicing attorney, you have heard of and hopefully you have read the Constitution?
Your closing argument lacks clarity and cohesion counselor.
Certainly you can do better than that.
 
What kind of lawyer are you?
Being a JD and a practicing attorney, you have heard of and hopefully you have read the Constitution?
Your closing argument lacks clarity and cohesion counselor.
Certainly you can do better than that.
You don't need to be a lawyer and there's no argument. If we have less guns, we have fewer gun deaths. If you think we need them to fight tyranny, you're nuts. If you think the constitution says we can all own a bazooka without restriction, you're nuts again.
 
I think Wez forgot about some handy tools...

Such as this one.



Z0uCtzjcpEx_.JPG



Wez doesn't know his history very well, especially
Martial Arts.

garden+tools+8.JPG


They look quite bland, who would think.....
 
You don't need to be a lawyer and there's no argument. If we have less guns, we have fewer gun deaths. If you think we need them to fight tyranny, you're nuts. If you think the constitution says we can all own a bazooka without restriction, you're nuts again.


Go ahead......take the weapons ya fool.

lidl-front.jpg


How about this sick guy below, you going to " Outlaw " kitchen utensils too ?

c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800.jpg


It's not the Weapon that kills.....and I don't care how many " Lawyers " that
sue to get rid of Guns, if a sick individual wants to create harm they will.
As I've stated before....

It all starts with Parenting.

Wez and xyz, you guys have no clue what the REAL problem is !
 
You don't need to be a lawyer and there's no argument. If we have less guns, we have fewer gun deaths. If you think we need them to fight tyranny, you're nuts. If you think the constitution says we can all own a bazooka without restriction, you're nuts again.
Great argument counselor...bazooka's ?
We'd have a lot less debate if we outlawed free speech.
If we allowed off sides there would be more scoring in soccer.
If we performed less abortions we'd have more births....
You want to put up a banner in front of your house proclaiming it a gun free zone...have at it.
d089893f6436a42380aea5c4101b1d10--fun-stuff-funny-shit.jpg
 
Great argument counselor...bazooka's ?
We'd have a lot less debate if we outlawed free speech.
If we allowed off sides there would be more scoring in soccer.
If we performed less abortions we'd have more births....
You want to put up a banner in front of your house proclaiming it a gun free zone...have at it.
d089893f6436a42380aea5c4101b1d10--fun-stuff-funny-shit.jpg
Glad you agree that if we had fewer guns, we'd have fewer deaths. I assume you agree we shouldn't have bazookas.
 
Back
Top