2020...

President Biden won't be discussing Trump come January. You fools will still be talking about Hillary and socialism. LOL!
I hope Joe is still able to speak at all come January.
He better pick an extraordinary VP as they will complete Joe's term.
Joe won't last a year...
 
Listen to Lady G...


His campaign is about protecting our borders, a robust economy and record level of employment.

You fucking losers can call him a racist all you want. Facts and crime statistics aren't racist... they're truthful... even if they hurt your feelings.

I have a question for Lindsey... what is Biden's campaign run about? Mumbling and sniffing children? Fixing what he couldn't do in over 40 years?
 
They couldnt find anyone with any knowledge of the quid pro quo. Yes I know they kept changing the terms as nothing worked.

It was an interesting thing watching the liberal press report on it. After about every witness they would say so and so blew the case open regarding quid pro quo. They conveniently avoided mentioning that on cross by the Repubs, every single witness testified the he or she had no actual knowledge of the supposed crime.

As an interesting aside. They were mad that Trump made comments about the former ambassador Yovanovich (spelling?). She testified that outside of being briefed just a little bit by the Obama admin during her confirmation hearing, she did not know anything about Burisma and the corruption investigation. Documents later came out under FOIA that showed 1) there were numerous emails from the embassy regarding Burisma but 2) she in fact had met with reps from Burisma to specifically talk about the corruption investigation.

Guess which news organizations again didn't bother following up to inform you and others of the new documents that came to light? Not only new documents that contradict her testimony, but documents that showed she in fact lied during the impeachment hearings.
 
They couldnt find anyone with any knowledge of the quid pro quo. Yes I know they kept changing the terms as nothing worked.

It was an interesting thing watching the liberal press report on it. After about every witness they would say so and so blew the case open regarding quid pro quo. They conveniently avoided mentioning that on cross by the Repubs, every single witness testified the he or she had no actual knowledge of the supposed crime.

As an interesting aside. They were mad that Trump made comments about the former ambassador Yovanovich (spelling?). She testified that outside of being briefed just a little bit by the Obama admin during her confirmation hearing, she did not know anything about Burisma and the corruption investigation. Documents later came out under FOIA that showed 1) there were numerous emails from the embassy regarding Burisma but 2) she in fact had met with reps from Burisma to specifically talk about the corruption investigation.

Guess which news organizations again didn't bother following up to inform you and others of the new documents that came to light? Not only new documents that contradict her testimony, but documents that showed she in fact lied during the impeachment hearings.

They why didn't the Senate hold hearings on the evidence? They could have cleared all that up by asking John Bolton, for instance, what he knew about it.
 
Actually, the poor right has nothing to hang onto at this point. Trump won almost 4 years ago and they keep talking about Hillary. Mueller found no collusion and they keep talking about that. Great strategies to keep moving forward. President Biden won't be talking about Trump!
Of course the right keeps talking about the Russia/Mueller investigation.

It is funny how the liberal press is not curious about:
- how did the whole thing start?
- the FBI got all their FISA warrants based in lies to the FISA court. The FBI said they had vetted all their info. We now know they didn't. The certainly should be something that is reviewed and gotten to the bottom of.
- we know now that by December the FBI had wrapped up their investigation of Flynn and found nothing wrong. Comey and others decided to keep it open. Shortly after they went after him regarding the call to the Russian ambassador. The press reported it as Flynn was trying to get sanctions overturned. We know know Comey told Obama/Biden and others the call was legit...and yet they went after the guy. We also just got the transcript of the call and that also verifies nothing happened to would lead to prosecuting that guy. That should be followed up on.
- The information regarding nothing there in terms of Russia collusion was widely known around the beginning of the Mueller investigation. And yet that continued on for 18 months or so. Why?

There are lots of shady things that seem to have happened. Everyone should want to get to the bottom of that. And yet after 3 yrs of peddling false news...now the press isnt interested in how this all started?
 
They why didn't the Senate hold hearings on the evidence? They could have cleared all that up by asking John Bolton, for instance, what he knew about it.
The House is the one to do the investigations. If they wanted to interview more witnesses, that was in their power. They chose not to.

It is not the Senate's job to do what the House refused to do.
 
The House is the one to do the investigations. If they wanted to interview more witnesses, that was in their power. They chose not to.

It is not the Senate's job to do what the House refused to do.
It was the Senate who refused to interview witnesses, not the House.

So if life is like a high school, you would not be the civics teacher, you would be the cheerleading coach.

"Give me a t..."
 
Of course the right keeps talking about the Russia/Mueller investigation.

It is funny how the liberal press is not curious about:
- how did the whole thing start?
- the FBI got all their FISA warrants based in lies to the FISA court. The FBI said they had vetted all their info. We now know they didn't. The certainly should be something that is reviewed and gotten to the bottom of.
- we know now that by December the FBI had wrapped up their investigation of Flynn and found nothing wrong. Comey and others decided to keep it open. Shortly after they went after him regarding the call to the Russian ambassador. The press reported it as Flynn was trying to get sanctions overturned. We know know Comey told Obama/Biden and others the call was legit...and yet they went after the guy. We also just got the transcript of the call and that also verifies nothing happened to would lead to prosecuting that guy. That should be followed up on.
- The information regarding nothing there in terms of Russia collusion was widely known around the beginning of the Mueller investigation. And yet that continued on for 18 months or so. Why?

There are lots of shady things that seem to have happened. Everyone should want to get to the bottom of that. And yet after 3 yrs of peddling false news...now the press isnt interested in how this all started?
Blah blah blah.
We knew the Russians helped Trump and there were a lot of relationships there...the AG even recused himself.
Why don’t you go lose yourself in weeds over an investigation from 2 years ago.
After that, turn to Watergate and tell us about that hoax.
 
They couldnt find anyone with any knowledge of the quid pro quo. Yes I know they kept changing the terms as nothing worked.

It was an interesting thing watching the liberal press report on it. After about every witness they would say so and so blew the case open regarding quid pro quo. They conveniently avoided mentioning that on cross by the Repubs, every single witness testified the he or she had no actual knowledge of the supposed crime.

As an interesting aside. They were mad that Trump made comments about the former ambassador Yovanovich (spelling?). She testified that outside of being briefed just a little bit by the Obama admin during her confirmation hearing, she did not know anything about Burisma and the corruption investigation. Documents later came out under FOIA that showed 1) there were numerous emails from the embassy regarding Burisma but 2) she in fact had met with reps from Burisma to specifically talk about the corruption investigation.

Guess which news organizations again didn't bother following up to inform you and others of the new documents that came to light? Not only new documents that contradict her testimony, but documents that showed she in fact lied during the impeachment hearings.
I think you’re losing it a bit. Sorry, bud.
 
Not at all. Look where the investigations the last 3 plus years have gotten you. I assume you had your hopes up the whole time...only to be disappointed time and time again.
Gotten me? There’s always investigations. Trump made himself a target and even when he didn’t, when we here in the USA discovered conclusively they Putin helped him get elected (fact, sorry), we investigated and, correct me if I’m wrong, people went to jail for lying about their Russian encounters, correct?
Ukraine was self-explanatory.
Get over it, dude. Why are you obsessing?
Go campaign for him...he needs normal people to help him, if you are one.
 
when we here in the USA discovered conclusively they Putin helped him get elected (fact, sorry)
Lay those facts on me.

Wow. I didn't realize the tin foil brigade were that far gone in the fever swamps.

Conclusively helped to get him elected. Lay it on all of us here.

I am curious as to what specific fever swamp you reside in.
 
You must not have read the Mueller report.
I thought you had.
Or did you just hear that it said collusion couldn’t be established, so you accepted that part and went full wacko on all the other parts.
What are you, some kinda nut?
 
You must not have read the Mueller report.
I thought you had.
Or did you just hear that it said collusion couldn’t be established, so you accepted that part and went full wacko on all the other parts.
What are you, some kinda nut?

Timeframe loosely constructed from memory --

Mueller finishes report
DOJ (Barr) cuts out a lot of parts and says "no collusion"
T says "fully exonerated"
Mueller says "wait a minute - that's not what the report says"
T-sheeple (to this day) say "fully exonerated"
 
Back
Top