Who Hates America Now . . . or where future terrorist will come from

Discussion in 'Off Topic 2' started by Hüsker Dü, Oct 11, 2019.

  1. Hüsker Dü

    Hüsker Dü DA

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2016
    Messages:
    9,715
    Likes Received:
    396
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +4,691 / 242
    The list includes peoples from around the world, now add the Kurds . . . Central Americans, Africans, Afghanis, Palestinians, Ukrainians, South and North Koreans, Chinese, British, the EU, Australians, Kiwis . . . and that's just the ones t has pissed off.
     
  2. Bruddah IZ

    Bruddah IZ DA

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,633
    Likes Received:
    1,879
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings:
    +10,227 / 109
    This time you shall not pass 'cause I'm the dragon smog,
    I'm a small axe move big trees you still play with Lincoln logs
     
  3. Sheriff Joe

    Sheriff Joe

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2016
    Messages:
    21,569
    Likes Received:
    2,474
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings:
    +11,412 / 190
    You forgot AntiAmerican pussy bitches like you.
     
  4. Bruddah IZ

    Bruddah IZ DA

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,633
    Likes Received:
    1,879
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings:
    +10,227 / 109
    https://www.dissentmagazine.org/wp-content/files_mf/1353953160genovesethequestion.pdf

    Especially amusing has been the spectacle of those who pronounced themselves anti-Stalinists and denounced the socialist countries at every turn and yet even today applaud each new revolution, although any damned fool has to know that most of them will end in the same place. For that matter, how could we have survived politically were it not for the countless liberals who, to one extent or another, supported us, apparently under the comforting delusion that we were social reformers in rather too much of a hurry—a delusion we ourselves never suffered from.

    There are liberals and liberals, and a distinction would have to be made in a more leisurely presentation. Even in academia there are indeed those who defend liberal principles tenaciously and honorably. But the countless opportunists and careerists who dominate the historical associations call themselves liberals as a matter of political convenience. They went with the McCarthyite flow in the 1950s and go with its left-wing variant today. In the unlikely prospect of a fascist or communist ascendancy tomorrow, they may be counted on to apply for party cards as soon as it looks like the smart move
     
  5. Bruddah IZ

    Bruddah IZ DA

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,633
    Likes Received:
    1,879
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings:
    +10,227 / 109
    On May 11, 1992, having been invited by the right-wing American Enterprise Institute to reflect on the collapse of the socialist countries, I summoned up whatever capacity I have for dissembling in an effort to deflect the one question I did not want to answer. I did not want to answer it before a right-wing audience because I feared I would unleash my Sicilian temper and counterattack with the litany of the crimes of the imperialists and their insufferable apologists. I began:

    It is a great pleasure to be with you today although, since I claim expertise only as a historian of the Old South, I speak on current issues with trepidation. I do hope that your invitation carries no sadistic intent—that you do not expect an autobiographical mea culpa. For while it is true that I have been a Marxist and a bitter-end supporter of the Soviet Union, I dislike autobiographies and admire the CIA's noble dictum, "Admit nothing, explain nothing, apologize for nothing." The audience responded with good-natured laughter. Generally speaking, rightwingers are decidedly more courteous than we of the left and would not think of abusing their guests, as I probably would have abused them if challenged.
     
  6. Bruddah IZ

    Bruddah IZ DA

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,633
    Likes Received:
    1,879
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings:
    +10,227 / 109
    We easily forget the economic rationale that Marx taught us, namely, that socialism would have to provide unprecedented abundance if it were to sustain social liberation of any kind. With a few notable exceptions, leftists no longer find it fashionable to discuss economics at all beyond the now-routine rejection of a "command economy" and some disingenuous mumbling about the necessity for markets. But where is there a serious attempt to determine the extent to which any socialism could function without a command economy or to show how a socialist economy could integrate markets? A few left-wing economists, most notably, Louis Ferleger and Jay Mandle tried to raise these questions long before the collapse of the socialist economies, but they were effectively shut out of the left-wing press and are still ignored. And we may doubt that the wry remark of Nancy Folbre and Samuel Bowles, two other respected left-wing economists, will cause a wrinkle: "Leftwing economists— among whom we count ourselves—have thus far failed to come up with a convincing alternative to capitalism." (Nancy Folbre and Samuel Bowles, letter to the Nation, Nov. 29, 1993; and see also, Louis Ferleger and Jay R. Mandle, A New Mandate: Democratic Choices for a Prosperous Economy, University of Missouri Press, 1994).
     
  7. nononono

    nononono DA

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2016
    Messages:
    8,607
    Likes Received:
    709
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings:
    +4,089 / 58
    Hey Rat Rodent/Husky Poop....which " Kurds " are you referencing...

    And..........do you Mr 100 % DIPSHIT really want to take the position
    of leaving 50 AMERICAN troops in harms way when the President
    of Turkey GAVE YOU A HEADS UP of his intent to invade and
    left you an opening to have 0 % of OUR Troops injured or killed
    while two " Tribes " go at it.....

    Is THAT what YOU would DO with OUR AMERICAN TROOPS...!!!!

    ANSWER that DIPSHIT.....!
     

Share This Page