Climate and Weather


The 2016 weather year (Dec-Nov) was already cited as the hottest in the record. Dec 2016 was the second-hottest December in the record, behind only December 2015.

The numbers --

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt

Last three years --

2014 73 51 77 78 87 66 57 82 90 85 67 79 74 73 64 81 68 81
2015 81 86 90 74 78 78 71 78 81 106 104 111 87 84 82 81 76 97
2016 117 135 130 109 93 76 83 98 87 89 93 81 99 102 121 111 85 90
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J-D D-N DJF MAM JJA SON
 
The 2016 weather year (Dec-Nov) was already cited as the hottest in the record. Dec 2016 was the second-hottest December in the record, behind only December 2015.

The numbers --

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt

Last three years --

2014 73 51 77 78 87 66 57 82 90 85 67 79 74 73 64 81 68 81
2015 81 86 90 74 78 78 71 78 81 106 104 111 87 84 82 81 76 97
2016 117 135 130 109 93 76 83 98 87 89 93 81 99 102 121 111 85 90
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J-D D-N DJF MAM JJA SON
Which outliers did they eliminate and why?
 
Polar ice cores measuring gases in trapped bubbles can reveal the Earth’s temperature record over tens of thousands of years. Palaeoclimatologists look further back, using a different method. They collect sediments from the ocean floor and study the shells of ancient plankton. These shells reveal daily temperature ranges as far back as 200 million years, and show a planet at times frozen from pole to equator, and at other times much hotter than today.
http://www.abc.net.au/radionational...h-colder2c-and-much-hotter-than-today/5042886
 
These shells reveal daily temperature ranges as far back as 200 million years, and show a planet at times frozen from pole to equator, and at other times much hotter than today.

Nobody is saying Climate hasn't changed in the past. What is new and should be studied and discussed, is mankind's activities (since the industrial revolution) potentially expediting potentially catastrophic change. What is foolish is to deny that possibility.

The fact that still needs to be clarified is sad.
 
Nobody is saying Climate hasn't changed in the past. What is new and should be studied and discussed, is mankind
co2_800k_zoom.png
's activities (since the industrial revolution) potentially expediting potentially catastrophic change. What is foolish is to deny that possibility.

The fact that still needs to be clarified is sad.
co2_800k_zoom.png

https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/k...plugins/sio-bluemoon/graphs/co2_800k_zoom.png
 
Nobody is saying Climate hasn't changed in the past. What is new and should be studied and discussed, is mankind's activities (since the industrial revolution) potentially expediting potentially catastrophic change. What is foolish is to deny that possibility.

The fact that still needs to be clarified is sad.
Who is denying that possibility? Certainly not 97% of scientist right? Relax dude. Be the change you wish to see in the world. My brother in law is living it. Veggie oil converted cars, straw bail home with conferences throughout the year to teach straw bail construction, solar panels, water catchment. You're a poser. My brother in law is the real deal.
 
Every time some jackass reminds us that Climate has changed in the past, they must be denying the possibility of AGW since a reminder is totally unnecessary and worthless in the discussion.
"Ahhhh temperatures go up and down . . . and oh yeah, winter still happens, so, so yeah everything is fine, Exxon said so!" ~ Mr. Doomass
 
"Ahhhh temperatures go up and down . . . and oh yeah, winter still happens, so, so yeah everything is fine, Exxon said so!" ~ Mr. Doomass

Exxon is now in the green camp, if you believe their recent advertising. Perhaps the thousands of scientists and engineers who work for the company have been talking to their supervisors. Or perhaps they have realized the risk of stockholder lawsuits if they knowingly make false statements about the future viability of their products.
 
Exxon is now in the green camp, if you believe their recent advertising. Perhaps the thousands of scientists and engineers who work for the company have been talking to their supervisors. Or perhaps they have realized the risk of stockholder lawsuits if they knowingly make false statements about the future viability of their products.
Coocoo
 
Every time some jackass reminds us that Climate has changed in the past, they must be denying the possibility of AGW since a reminder is totally unnecessary and worthless in the discussion.
Until you switch over to veggie oil like my brother in law, your arguments are dead to me. Stop posing.
 
Back
Top